Gelbman: Overbuilding in Flower Mound

Post Ad – Top
Itamar Gelbman, Place 5, Flower Mound Town Council.

For the last few months I have been warning that we are overbuilding the commercial properties in Flower Mound, and as always, I have been personally attacked by the Council members and their supporters, many of whom are personal friends with the developers or the land owners. But is it true? Are we overbuilding the commercial properties and senior care properties?

One way to see who is right is to look at the physical occupancy of the properties. Here is where you will see a game of musical chairs.  As brand new retail centers go “live,” developers aggressively look for tenants – mostly because brand new construction has a much higher cost basis than older properties and usually a much larger loan that needs to be paid. Commercial developers need to quickly lease their properties to begin to recover their costs, and are willing to discount the rent in order to attract tenants.  Another factor in the desire to rent quickly is the repayment of net, net, net, or NNN charges. NNN charges are a way for the landlord to pass-through expenses (such as property tax, insurance, maintenance, etc…) to the tenants. It is an additional charge on top of the rent and each tenant in a commercial property pays his share (according to the % the tenant occupied space) to the landlord. So if the property is at 60% occupancy, the landlord pays from his own pocket the rest of the 40% operation cost, while if the property is at 100% occupancy, the landlord pays nothing out of pocket.

By having so much available square footage to lease, the landlords with the highest basis and costs are more aggressively interested in leasing their properties. This creates a major problem, as in some cases the brand new developments are leasing their spaces cheaper than the older developments. This is like a musical chair game which might makes you believe that there are more commercial tenants in town, but in fact it is the same amount of square footage leased. For example, the Starbucks that was on 2499 and 3040 next to Tom Thumb relocated to Lakeside, then Trio Coffee that was on 2499 next to Wells Fargo relocated to the old Starbucks location, and Wells Fargo relocated to a brand new standalone building. Here is a perfect example of 3 commercial tenants that relocated, creating the feeling that we are growing.

Another way to know we are hurting ourselves on the commercial development component of our town is to look at the property taxes. While your residential property is being assessed based on recent sales and comparisons, commercial property owners can appeal their assessments and they then get reassess based on their net operating income, which may result in a lower tax. This brings us to a very interesting fact; when the council voted for adopting the Town Tax Rate, I was the only member who fought for a lower property tax rate, and was once again personally attacked by the same council members.

So let me ask you these two questions:

First, for the current tax year, was your property assessed lower than the year before? My bet is that your answer is “no.”

Second, if my fellow council members are convinced that allowing more commercial and senior care properties to build in Flower Mound actually reduces residential property taxes, how come a big portion of these commercial properties were assessed LOWER than the previous year and in some cases, are now assessed lower than they were assessed in 2008, in the heart of the recession?

According to Denton Central Appraisal District ( the following properties were assessed lower in 2016 than in previous years:

  • Calloway’s on 2499 was assessed in 2015 for $3,077,772 and for $2,326,951 in 2016, a $750,821 decrease.
  • The commercial property on 1900 Long Prairie was assessed in 2014 for $7,019,571 and for $6,250,000 in 2016, a $769,571 decrease!
  • The commercial property on 3301 Long Prairie Rd was assessed in 2015 for $3,397,388 and for $3,289,050 in 2016, a $108,338 decrease!

As I mentioned earlier, some commercial properties are now assessed lower than they did in 2008 and 2009, the heart of the worst recession of modern times.  Some examples are:

  • The Tom Thumb property on 2499 & 3040 was assessed in 2008 for $11,260,360 and in 2016 for $8,444,000. That is whopping decrease of almost three million dollars!
  • The Gas Station at 3300 Long Prairie Rd was assessed in 2008 for $955,800 and for $675,000 in 2016, a $280,800 decrease!
  • CVS on Morriss & 3040 was assessed for $3,313,982 in 2008 and for $2,780,568 in 2016, a $533,414 decrease!
  • Target on 2499 was assessed for $14,192,048 in 2008 and for $11,911,560 in 2016, a $2,280,488 decrease!

And there are many more.  In the senior care facilities we see similar trends:

  • Rosewood Assistant living was assessed for $8,982,740 in 2014 and for $8,000,000 in 2016, almost a $1,000,000 decrease.
  • Autumn Leaves was assessed for $3,330,000 in 2014, and for $2,825,000 in 2016, a $505,000 decrease.
  • Flower Mound assistant living was assessed for $2,389,085 in 2014 and for $1,771,665 in 2016, a $617,420 decrease.

Flower Mound has always been a successful town, even during the last recession. Flower Mound didn’t get hurt as much as other towns and cities across the country, and I believe that one reason for this is the pride of ownership. When residents have their hard earned money invested in their own properties, they tend to take care of it.  Flower Mound is an upper class community with many smart and well educated individuals who know how to secure themselves financially and to save for a rainy day, like a recession. This type of ownership doesn’t exist in Multi-Family properties and even at some older commercial properties.

A major purpose for having commercial properties is to lower the tax burden on the residential, personal property owner, and as you can see, we are doing the exact opposite.

I am the lone council member who is fighting for higher construction standards, as I want to make sure we attract the right kind of businesses; those that will be successful long term.  By lowering the standards and giving exemptions and waivers to commercial developers in order to attract any business we can, we are hurting ourselves in the long run, as a big portion of these retail businesses are vulnerable to recessions.

My opponent is a commercial real estate developer who refuses to answer even simple questions concerning how he would of vote on new developments, and in some cases even joked that we are “a development district.”

Once again, I am asking for your vote so we can assure a sustainable Flower Mound for our future generations.

Content Ad – (Bottom of Posts)

About The Author

Related posts


  1. Avatar

    Perfect example of the problems with the Flower Mound Town Council. Mr Webb needs to have more rubber stamps to approve of his childish and bad behavior in Council meetings and towards citizens of the Town. I am surprised his comments do not include one of his common 4 letter words he uses at Council meetings or when dealing with citizens who have a different opinion. Mr Webb did not respond to any other post by candidates running for Council, so why now? Simple, in order to be a bully, you need others to stand by and do nothing. Mr Webb already has 4 rubber stamps on Council and apparently that is not enough. If you want more traffic, more wasted time sitting at even more traffic lights, more road construction and more apartments in Flower Mound filling up our beautiful wide open spaces, then please listen to Mr Webb. If you want our Town Council to stop behaving like children, please consider anyone Mr Webb opposes!

  2. Avatar
    Bryan C Webb

    In 2012 when I was elected to Town Council, residential property made up 73% of the Town’s Market value according to Denton County Appraisal District.
    The preliminary numbers for 2017 show that the homeowners burden has been reduced to 69%.
    The Non-Homesite values (commercial properties) increased by 5%.
    The actual numbers follow:
    Homesite: 2012 $5.642 billion vs 2017 $8.291 billion
    Commercial: 2012 $1.813 billion vs 2017 of $3.427 Billion.
    The Commercial tax base increased by 89% while the residential tax base increased by 47%. The commercial property vacancy rate stands at <5%. Contrary to what this council member would ask you to believe, Flower Mound has a very healthy commercial property market.

    Rely on facts and verifiable numbers. Vote for candidates with integrity.

    1. Avatar
      Emil Soleyman-Zomalan

      Mr. Webb,

      I looked at both the 2012 and 2017 Denton CAD property values and came away with a different set of numbers and analysis.

      The residential tax base increased from $5,641,651,325 to $8,290,880,496 and the commercial tax base increased from $1,284,300,463 to $2,663,631,027. This represents an relative increase of 47% for residents and 107.5% for business. However, this is
      only an absolute decrease of 5.78% for residents and 5.78% increase for
      businesses. This is the number that we should be focused on as it represents the truest change in the tax burden for homeowners.

      Based on the worksheet that I created using numbers from Denton CAD, the residential tax based represents 75.68% of the overall property values in the town and commercial tax base represents 24.32%.

      I am unable to ascertain why certain businesses paid less taxes due to an downward adjustment in Total Improvement Value from 2014 to today while most if not all residential properties have seen a steady increase in that time period. Mr. Gelbman has done spot checks on some of the bigger commercial properties and has seen this occur. It may be best to understand why that is.

      The steady increase in the number of homes and business has increased overall traffic in Flower Mound and affected traffic patterns up and down FM 2499. It has become difficult to leave and enter our town during the mornings and early to late afternoons — in some instances we are idling in traffic for 15 to 30 minutes to get onto the highway. Our infrastructure is growing as a result of increased homes and businesses and every year it becomes that much more expensive to maintain.

      My worksheet is attached to this comment. Please look it over and see if the mathematics are correct. I’ve also referred back to the sources of these numbers.

      [3] (2013 Traffic Counts)
      [4] (2016 Traffic Counts)

Comments are closed.

Front Page – News