Rotating Leaderboard Ad – Top
Rotating Leaderboard Ad – Top
Rotating Leaderboard Ad – Top
Rotating Leaderboard Ad – Top

3D mammography increases accuracy

Post Ad – Top
Bryan Maupin
Dr. Bryan Maupin

By Dr. Bryan Maupin

Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths among U.S. women.

The American Cancer Society estimates that approximately 230,000 women will be diagnosed with invasive breast cancer and an additional 60,000 with in situ cancer (very early cancer) in 2015. It further estimates that 40,000 women in the U.S. will die from breast cancer in 2015.

October is Breast Cancer Awareness Month. And at least for that month, pink becomes the new black. To promote awareness, numerous activities will be held in our communities throughout that month. However, the fight against breast cancer goes on every day. The primary tool in that fight is the use of screening mammography for early detection.

Modern mammography dates from the late 1980s and since its implementation, screening has demonstrated the ability to significantly reduce cancer mortality. Multiple large population controlled studies have demonstrated a reduction of 20 to 30 percent. Beginning in the early 2000s, digital mammography was introduced and, when compared to traditional film mammography, demonstrated improved cancer detection for women under the age of 50, those with dense breast tissue, as well as pre/perimenopausal women.

Today 97 percent of all mammography is digital. The next significant advance in screening technology was the development of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) or 3-D mammography. Since FDA approval in 2011, 3-D imaging has gone from a research tool to an ever-expanding clinical application. Texas Health Flower Mound Women’s Imaging Center was one of the first in the Flower Mound community to implement 3-D imaging in July of 2014.

Studies demonstrate that 3-D imaging contributed to a 30 percent increase in cancer detection and a 20 percent decrease in the number of patients recalled. Currently, Medicare is the only payer that covers 3-D imaging. Therefore, patients must elect to have 3-D imaging at an additional out-of-pocket charge.

I, and many others, believe that 3-D imaging is beneficial to all women, but especially beneficial to women with dense breast tissue. Given the improved performance of 3-D imaging, it deserves your serious consideration when you undergo your next mammogram.

And when is that? The current recommendations of the American Cancer Society, American College of Radiology, and Society of Breast Imaging are to begin annual screening mammography at age 40 and to continue for as long as the woman is in good health.

Hope to see you soon!
Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Flower Mound Women’s Imaging Center, 2560 Central Park Avenue, Suite 240, Flower Mound, TX 75028 TexasHealthFlowerMound.com/mammogram

Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Flower Mound is a joint venture owned by Texas Health Resources and physicians dedicated to the community and meets the definition under federal law of a physician owned hospital. Doctors on the medical staff practice independently and are not employees or agents of the hospital.

Content Ad – Middle (Bottom of Posts)

About The Author

Related posts

  • Rivilas

    This is biased slick product advertisement, disguised as “educational” information, of corporate medicine for one of their highly lucrative yet highly toxic interventions, 3D mammography.

    You can readily see right from the start that this is disinformation rather than factual information when Maupin states the deceptive falsehood that “the fight against breast cancer goes on every day. The primary tool in that fight is the use of screening mammography for early detection.” Mammograms do nothing to fight breast cancer as they don’t prevent it but only detect it -well, even that only at best.

    The high-paid members of corporate medicine and other shills for the cancer business put out such distortions and lies about mammograms and breast cancer every day.

    Contrary to the official narrative (which is based on medical business-fabricated pro-mammogram “scientific” data), there is marginal, if any, reliable evidence that mammography, including 3D mammograms, reduce mortality from breast cancer in a significant way in any age bracket but a lot of solid evidence shows the procedure does provide more serious harm than serious benefit (read: Peter Gotzsche’s ‘Mammography Screening: Truth, Lies and Controversy’ and Rolf Hefti’s ‘The Mammogram Myth’ – see synopsis at TheMammogramMyth dot com).

    Organized medicine has a new product it needs to market. And as usually, it promoters don’t tell the public that 3D mammography leads to much more overdiagnosis (=more severe harm to healthy women) and more radiation exposure. The deception of women by the mammogram industry and its allied mass (disinformation) media is ongoing..

Content Ad Front Page – Top