| So what did you think the petition ordinance really meant? |
|
|
|
| Written by Virginia Simonson | |||
| Wednesday, 25 August 2010 09:52 | |||
|
First, thanks to Mr. Webb for writing an Op-Ed to Mr. Filidoro’s “100 Days” . I agree that it is very important to hold all elected officials accountable, whether you voted for them or not. But, as a member of the petition drive, I am saddened by the fact that Mr. Webb still JUST DOESN”T GET IT. He says - "One of the first things this council did…was to create the Oil and Gas Committee ... to seek out a broad range of ideas from different perspectives. Instead, this committee was loaded with individuals who shared a common desire…. outlined in the Flower Mound Cares Petition that all of the regular members signed." Are you missing the point, Mr. Webb - THE PETITION ORDINANCE IS THE LEGAL BASIS FOR THE ADVISORY COUNCIL. You know, six thousand people VOTED for this REVIEW, probably the same 6,000 that were the margin of victory for the NFL. Those 6,000 represented about 65% of the vote for the 2010 municipal election – seems like this “common desire” represents the will of “We, the People” of Flower Mound. Is that such a bad thing, Mr. Webb? Considering the divide on the current Council (just like the last), I think they did a pretty good job of selecting a diverse group of folks, with a lot of expertise in this area. Take a closer look at the backgrounds of those on the Board; they have the expertise to provide solid, valuable advice to the Council; the mix of folks on this Board makes them perfectly suited to conduct this review. There will be a normal tension between “the petition people” and the 3 industry reps. So, as the “petition people” push hard for the best practices, the industry people will push back just as hard with “cost realities”. And what do you think about the mediator, Virginia Moore? Well, she’s an oil and gas attorney who generally represents landowners with mineral rights, those folks who have the most to gain from exploiting their little piece of the Barnett Shale. So, somehow, it’s just possible they can craft recommendations that are the best compromise among groups with competing interests. Maybe, we’ll get better practices that are affordable and that protect both surface and mineral owners. Naturally, I wish, the Council would not have removed Jenny and Prakash at your urging, but they did, in an effort to lessen a critic’s ability to attack the forthcoming recommendations. Yet, you are not satisfied. Perhaps, you want to reprise the 2006 O&G Stakeholder’s Board that had only large landowners (represented by Bobby Dollack) and industry reps? Are you nostalgic for that that Advisory Board, the one embraced by Councilman Jeff Tasker (isn’t he an attorney for Williams, now?), the one that gave us the 2007 O&G Ordinance, that reduced all those pesky setbacks? At the end of the day, I also have a major concern about the current Advisory Board. The petition ordinance recognized that there are major problems with the way this Town approves oil and gas permits. Let’s hope that there won’t be too much outside interference that might try to control the free exchange of ideas; that might want to close the door on incorporating master planning into the ENTIRE oil & gas permitting process (as opposed to a cursory nod during the variance process). Let’s hope that the Board won’t be “limited to the legal box” that has allowed the strongest ordinance in North Texas to be watered down since 2007 into one which welcomes drilling into densely populated areas of our Town. After all, if NFL really wants to keep their promises, they will set us free from the amendment to the O&G ordinance that Mayor Jody Smith’s Council passed in 2007.
|
Comments
Ms. Simonson, as one of the key anti-urban drilling fears comes true on the Hilliard property; it is obvious that you and your followers have been greatly deceived by the NFL. As prejudice and emotions wane, facts and logic will speak the sad truth.
Unfortunately, this issue has polarized the community to such a degree that prejudice and emotion has consumed logic, fact and civil discourse. Political manipulation by our recently elected officials has further distorted the facts. They used this issue to get elected and gain control of the Town. Now their flawed integrity and true intentions are surfacing.
And perhaps they should show Ladd some more love. He worked hard to help get them elected (just think of all those long, boring op-eds he wrote), and they did reward big cash contributors with various appointments.
http://www.examiner.com/denton-county-nonpartisan-in-dallas/whom-can-you-trust-to-lead-flower-mound
“N”, Melissa Northern: First Mayor of Flower Mound to sit at town hall three days a week and count paperclips.
“F”, Al Filidoro: Is he “Standing Up for What Is Right” or has he “protect[ed] your family’s health and financial well-being”? Has he been communicating with concerned citizens on gas related issues, or has he been out if front on any issue? Or was he negotiating with Williams, then when it became known, back out of the deal? http://www.alfilidoro.com/message.htm
“L”, Steve Lyda: Did he “Stop the industrializati on of Flower Mound” or did he “Keep Gas Drilling Out of Our Neighborhoods” That was his two top points in his platform, see http://stevelyda.com/Platform.aspx
Me---When did Google become the acceptable level of "expertise"?
Seriously, is there no shame, or at least embarrassment coming from the anti-drillers for their frequent failures to get even basic facts correct? And these "talented" folks are representing us on this Advisory Council! Oh wait, Ginger isn't representing us, she's just suing the Town. I feel better.
RSS feed for comments to this post.