Banner
Speed traps not best use of police force PDF Print E-mail
Written by Bob Garlick   
Monday, 05 July 2010 10:59

As a long time resident of Double Oak (14 years) I have read Mr. Cooks opinions and philosophies over the years and have bitten my tongue but after reading his latest column in the July edition of The Cross Timbers Gazette, I have to speak out.

Double Oak rightly deserves its place in the speedtrap.org website. I rarely see police in town patrolling the neighborhoods but I do see them at least twice a day hiding on Kings or Simmons trying to give citations to unsuspecting motorists as they make their way through our town. Nothing infuriates me more than to read signs posted throughout our town that there is a Neighborhood Crime spree and then see our police sitting on the sides of the two main roads waiting to give out speeding tickets to people that are going 35 in a 30!

Contrary to what Mr. Cook says, the current policy of Double Oak and its “Traffic Calming” police enforcement does not work. I still see people running stop signs at the intersection of Kings and Simmons on a regular basis and I still see people speeding down Simmons as I try to get on to the street from my house.

Like Mr. Cook, I also remember the times when Double Oak had a part time police force and I don’t really understand why this town ever felt the need to increase the size of the force to its current level and cost if the majority of the work our police do is traffic enforcement.

If this town is really worried about the safety of the citizens, it should reanalyze it philosophy on the speeding policy, and the speed limits in this town and the actual priority of the police force. Perhaps our town council should determine if 30 mph on Simons and Kings is really justified and think about increasing that speed to 35. Maybe there are some alternatives to having our highly trained police force sitting in hiding on the sides of our streets. Perhaps, low profile speed bumps or rumble strips on the two main streets would reduce speeding and allow our police to do what they are paid to do which is protect us and ensure our safety.

I, unlike Mr. Cook, am not happy that we are highly visible on the speedtrap.org website because to me that means our police force is not doing what we expect them to do. Instead of keeping my neighborhood safe and showing a presence in all areas of our town, our police are spending their time on two main streets in hiding, to follow an old town council agenda that prioritized this sort of behavior years ago.

Hopefully with new members on the town council, these types of items will be reviewed and improved so we don’t have a well trained, paid police force making our town well known on a national website for speed traps while we continue to have property crime in this town.

Bob Garlick
Double Oak, TX

 

Comments  

 
+6 #1 James 2012-05-13 15:26
I have lived in Double Oak since 1977, back when Kings Rd. Was a dirt road and Bridlewood was a pasture, where I road my motor cycle. Since then I have grown very disappointed with the Double Oak police department. They sit everywhere in hiding looking to write tickets. It appears that the primary objective of the police is to generate revenue for the city. They had me pulled over for 36 in a 30 at the same time the girl was shot in Copper Canyon. Perhaps if they were patrolling for true crime they could have prevented this. They also gave me a ticked for 35 in a 30 on Easter, as I was going to church with my kids in the car. It boarders on harassment.
Quote
 

Add comment


Thanks for your interest in commenting on our website. We encourage you to share your thoughts and opinions. To encourage stimulating and civil discussions, we ask that you adhere to the following guidelines: You agree, through your use of this website that you will not post any material which is false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise in violation of ANY law. Legal actions can be taken against you. CrossTimbersGazette.com is not responsible for the content posted on this forum. We do not warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information presented. The messages express the views of the author, not necessarily the views of CrossTimbersGazette.com. Anyone who feels that a posted message is objectionable is encouraged to notify an administrator immediately. We have the rights to remove objectionable content, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold harmless CrossTimbersGazette.com, its owner, parent company, subsidies and any related websites to this forum. We at CrossTimbersGazette.com also reserve the right to reveal your identity (or any information we have about you) in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any information posted by you. Once your comment is published, it can be found in search results on websites like Google and Yahoo. If you feel a comment violates the above guidelines, please notify us at http://www.crosstimbersgazette.com/index.php/contact.


Security code
Refresh

Facebook Share

Share on facebook
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner