Banner
Clarifications on natural gas activities PDF Print E-mail
Written by Kelly Swan   
Tuesday, 23 March 2010 14:19

We are writing about two items from March 17 (“Filidoro and Hayden Say ‘Enough is Enough,’ and “Frac fluid spill reported in Flower Mound,”) to address a couple of issues that could benefit from clarification.

First, we agree that health and safety are of the utmost importance. Williams is committed to running its operations in a responsible, reliable manner that protects the public as well as our employees and contractors who visit our sites daily.

That’s why our Barnett Shale staff – a group that has more than 400 years of combined professional experience – includes local environmental, health and safety employees with backgrounds in air quality and bio-environmental technology.

Second, it is important for residents to know that any variance we sought never modified residential setbacks for houses beyond our leased properties, which stand at 1,000 feet. This is the equivalent of more than three football fields.

Third, the reference to elevated levels of methane and carbon disulfide may be a bit confusing to readers because it is presented out of context. The existence of carbon disulfide, while apparently posing no health concerns at the levels detected, has nothing to do with Williams’ operations. And, the levels of methane found still remain well below both state and federal regulations. For more information regarding these reports, see www.flower-mound.com/env_resources/env_resources_airquality.php.

Additionally, the air quality at and around our Flower Mound site on 1171/Scenic Road has been tested by experts on three separate occasions since the beginning of the year.

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality did two of the tests. Williams pro-actively initiated the third, performed by W&M Environmental Group, a Plano-based independent contractor, who used EPA protocols in their analysis. All three tests showed that the air was clean and well within the parameters of state requirements. We voluntarily provided the W&M report to the Town.

With regard to the suggestion for a moratorium and its proposed conditions, Williams is already meeting many of those provisions and will continue to strive to maintain our strong record of health and safety. 

Regrettably, there was an unexpected leak of flowback water on a Williams lease last week. This was due to a seal problem on a tank provided by one of our contractors. We are working to examine the event in order to prevent similar incidents from happening. 

The clean-up for the incident effectively protected public land and water. Ultimately, we contained and captured approximately 80 percent (65 of 80 barrels) of the water through a vacuum recovery process. The remainder was removed from the site in soil, which we replaced with fresh dirt. These efforts exceeded our initial response and remediation plan.

In closing, we plan to be a part of the Flower Mound Community for years to come. We understand and embrace our responsibility and we’re open to doing more outreach in town and finding common ground wherever we can.


Kelly Swan is a communications official for Williams. He has been with the company for 15 years, working with communities and news organizations.

 

Comments  

 
+25 #13 2010-04-12 13:46
Kelly,

It's been 3 weeks since some of us asked you questions in response to your post here, and we still haven't heard back from you.

Sure, we've seen your new web site, but that really doesn't tell us much of anything now, does it? Is it too much to ask that you/Williams address legitimate questions posed by Flower Mound citizens? After all, answering questions that aren't being asked is just wasting our time and yours.

We're waiting...and we're not letting you off the hook. If you want to be a good neighbor and continue to operate in OUR TOWN, then you owe us answers. If you refuse to cooperate, then you can expect that we will oppose your every move.

Or you could just leave.
Quote
 
 
-25 #12 2010-03-30 13:16
Mark, it's because of the chlorides (salt) contents. That's why you can't use seawater to irrigate farms. Saltwater will not allow growth. Thus the reason why in the olden days, they salted most of their meats to keep them from spoiling. The chloride content must be lower than 10,000ppm for it to be used for farming. The reason they remove the dirt, is so that when it is returned to the owner, plants and such will grow on that site.
Quote
 
 
+29 #11 2010-03-28 15:17
Thanks, Charlie. But as you pointed out, my questions were directed to Kelly, who chose to post the letter on Williams' behalf on this site. Do you think Kelly is unable to answer for himself? I'd really prefer to hear from him, if that's not asking too much.

He's a big boy, and Williams is a big company. I'm sure they can handle a little tough questioning from a concerned citizen.

Every day that goes by without an answer speaks volumes to those of us watching, and waiting...
Quote
 
 
+30 #10 2010-03-28 11:06
Hello Kelly,

I actually have a few simple questions. I have heard the words from gas companies that "flowback" water is not consider toxic, or hazardous, or dangerous to us citizens. If this is the case, then why the need to remove the soil where the leak occurred and replace it with fresh dirt? Also, it seems strange me, that someone would use the words "These efforts exceeded our initial response and remediation plans" when discussing a case of what has been described as a leak of water. Maybe you can describe to us why such an effort is needed for something we have been told is not bad for us?
Quote
 
 
-27 #9 2010-03-25 22:37
You have asked for Williams’ budget to "buy" the election. Why would a company bother to address a question of this nature? It is clear there is nothing to gain by debating with you.

Your movement claims you are not against drilling but just want to slow down or have a temporary moratorium.

However, judging by the reaction to any serious attempt to address the issues, it is clear that your movement will never be satisfied and therefore will never support lifting a moratorium if it were enacted. The latest example: skepticism was immediately raised on the cancer study.

Your movement is against the “industrializat ion” of Flower Mound, so whether drilling is safe or not does not appear to be the real issue.
Quote
 
 
+25 #8 2010-03-25 12:57
Uh, Kelly... Several questions have been asked of you here. We know you and your bosses have seen them.

The citizens of Flower Mound, which you've threatened to "be a part of...for years to come," are waiting for answers...

Cat got your tongue?
Quote
 
 
+29 #7 2010-03-24 11:49
Hey Charlie...go for it! I'd love to walk with you as you knock on doors seeking signatures for a "pro-drilling" petition! Hilarious!

And by the way, sure it's fair for them to conduct any campaign they like. This is America, after all, and the Supreme Court just affirmed their right to do so. All I ask is that the drilling companies (who aren't based in FloMo, or even Texas for that matter) disclose how much they're spending and on whose behalf. Such disclosure is required by law (for the companies and the candidates), if I'm not mistaken. But the reporting usually doesn't happen until well after the fact, when the election is over.

Shouldn't Williams be a good neighbor and let us know ahead of time? After all, the cost of their current telemarketing campaign probably dwarfs what the petition group has spent to date.

Most of us have volunteered our time to the effort. I doubt the same can be said for Williams' mouthpieces.
Quote
 
 
-35 #6 2010-03-24 09:11
The "anti-drillers" maketing campaign has far exceeded any "pro-drillers" campaign. There would be an uproar if the "pro-drillers" were going door to door to get a petition signed. If its OK for the "anti-drillers" to get their information out, then why not for the "pro-drillers"? Seems fair.
Quote
 
 
+30 #5 2010-03-24 09:04
Here's a thought Williams...Why don't you cough up the extra cash and pledge to follow the "Best Practices Guidelines" from the Texas Oil and Gas Accountabilty Project? If you want to bring industry into the suburbs--CLEAN and SAFE would be best! I would bet you would meet with less opposition from the citizens.

PS-STAY OUT OF FLO MO POLITICS!!!
Quote
 
 
-26 #4 2010-03-23 23:01
True or False?

Carbon disulfide gas is one of the most insidious poisons known to man.
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Facebook Share

Share on facebook
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner