Banner
Good people making bad decisions PDF Print E-mail
Written by Bob Weir   
Monday, 15 October 2012 11:37

Last Monday, the Flower Mound Town Council terminated the contract of our town manager, a move that will cost several hundred thousand dollars in severance pay. They told us that Mr. Jefferson was bad for business growth, citing an attitude which they say restrains progress.

Those who are familiar with the recent history of politics in this town might have a different view of why he had to go. Some say it was payback; revenge for refusing to run interference during a political situation a few years ago. Others say he got canned because he was diligently following the Smart Growth Program and the Master Plan, which makes it difficult for developers to, among other things, build a plethora of tall, high-density apartment buildings in an area where residents are already concerned about over-crowding. Those are known as standards, without which we’d soon look like a long line of rundown inner city projects adorned with graffiti. Instead, our town has been listed in national magazines as one of the best places to live in the entire country. Since this assassination of Mr. Jefferson began, I’ve wondered why this Council would remove the man whose management experience put us on those lists. The mayor says it was nothing personal.

Really? Well, firing the guy whose only crime seems to be that he stood for quality development, which resulted in resident satisfaction being near the top of the list in Forbes, D Magazine and other publications, is truly bizarre. I suppose if we were rated number one in the world, he would have been forced to face a firing squad.

Evidently, this Council feels that they received some sort of mandate when they were elected in May. Let’s keep in mind that the placement of fuel stations in the Kroger parking lot was a major part of their campaign rhetoric. Yet, when they took office they voted for the same proposal that the former Council was willing to vote for. If they played politics with that issue, it’s easy to believe that they played politics with the town manager issue.

The problem with politics is that it often turns good people into self-centered egomaniacs. I know these Council members are decent, family-oriented people, but, unless they’re not telling us the whole story (something we have a right to know) about this costly decision, their judgment should be questioned. Paying hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxpayer money, whether to satisfy the lust for revenge, or to prove how powerful they are, shows no respect for the average working man and woman who deserves better than to be a pawn in a supercilious chess game.

Now they tell us they have started a search for a new manager. One wonders how long it will take to find someone who will go along to get along. Frankly, if the Council wants to make all decisions affecting the town, why should we pay a town manager, or a town staff, for that matter? After all, why pay people to use judgment in their positions when you can simply fire them for doing their jobs?

As part of their campaign to massacre anyone who stands in their way, they have recently dismissed Planning and Zoning Commission members and replaced them with those who, presumably, will be a rubber stamp for a Council that has decided to rule by fiat. Incidentally, they could have simply overruled the P & Z each time the commission tried to support the town’s high standards. However, that would indicate to concerned residents that the Council was in direct conflict with the group responsible for carefully studying and recommending the highest standards for the town. Therefore, instead of allowing for a professional difference of opinion, it was ‘off with their heads.’

Okay, now that they’ve had their way with the town manager brouhaha, it’s time to deal with the future of this eternally controversial burg. It’s time for this Council to tell us how much they plan to increase the density, with all the ramifications that will include, in the form of increased servicing costs, additional schools, roads, etc.

It’s not their integrity I question, because I believe them to be above reproach. Still, if they intend to okay the development of thousands of apartments, a move that would not have been possible under the current Master Plan, we the people should be consulted before we have alterations made in our quality of life. Furthermore, we should be told why this Council suddenly decided to drastically change the character of this town immediately after being sworn into office.

Public Information Requests, under the Open Records Act, may be the only way to uncover what’s going on around here. That is, unless this Council has decided to terminate the right of public discovery too.

 

 

 

Comments  

 
+7 #45 bob, bob, bob 2012-10-20 10:32
Have you read the ex managers contract? If you have a copy, please post it.

Until you read the contract, your assertion that the only reason to pay $400k is because council members are foolish, ego maniacs or corrupt is speculative at best.

The American judicial system is full of examples of badly written contracts leading to large payments being made to undeserving parties. Is this the case here? Until we read the contract there is no way to know.

I would ask that if the contract was badly written, why did the council approve it? This maybe the real case of the council being foolish or corrupt or both.
Quote
 
 
+5 #44 Just Look North 2012-10-18 12:18
The District of Highland Village, was Townhomes now apartments. The sign of things to come.
Quote
 
 
+8 #43 Whats next? 2012-10-18 10:23
It's difficult to criticize the actions of people that seem nice and are neighbors and friends in personal life. It gets easier when we see them have such lack of respect for our tax dollars though. We all want to think the best of this group, but many of their decisions make no sense lately. Examples? Firing Harlan and paying him $400,000 and hinting that there was cause (what employer would pay almost half a million dollars if they had actual evidence?). Wanting to turn the Lakeside Parkway multiple lanes (that many people use to cross the lake into Grapevine) into one lane with zilch in the way of traffic studies done. Flower Mound has invested millions in infrastructure there, and this is an ingress/egress to town(and now the want to make it a parking lot at the request of a developer with a shady background?). Selling off land for far less than it's market value (Chinn Chapel). What's coming next?
Quote
 
 
+2 #42 Gas rigs 2012-10-18 09:57
Ah the gas issue makes it back.

The gas rigs won't be coming back any time soon unless maybe you pay them to come back. We got dry gas, and dry gas is bountiful and too cheap. They have moved on to wetter gas and oil.
Quote
 
 
+12 #41 Bob Weir 2012-10-18 08:13
I'm not against Lakeside DFW; I'm against a Town Council that will not level with the residents about their plans to allow thousands of apts to be built in an area that we were told would be a showplace for our town. Where are the plans for those upscale restaurants and shopping areas we were told would be a huge draw for out of town shoppers? It seems more like they are planning to build the customers inside the project and then hope the businesses follow. There must be a reason why this Council is refusing to respond to those Public Info Requests. They promised transparency, they're giving us secrecy. When a govt body refuses to provide info to the citizens, they have become tyrants. If they get away with this, it won't be long before they dismantle the Oil and Gas Board of Appeals, opening the door to gas rigs from one end of town to the other. All residents should be demanding compliance with the Open Records Act!
Quote
 
 
-8 #40 CA 2012-10-18 07:38
Let's sign a Confidentiality Agreement and then release all information through a PIR?????

What?
Quote
 
 
+7 #39 Elaine Barry 2012-10-18 00:12
Thank you, Bob, for informing us all about the lack of transparency via refusing PIR's. Will you please keep us informed?
Quote
 
 
-9 #38 Rural nature 2012-10-17 20:46
I just 'love' the rural nature of the trailer park down at lakeside.
Quote
 
 
-5 #37 @bob 2012-10-17 19:56
Its disappointing to learn you are against Lakeside DFW bob
Quote
 
 
-3 #36 Kelly 2012-10-17 19:19
Apartments in the Mixed-Use Lakeside DFW development… Bob, you scooped everyone!
Now I see. Bob Weir is against Lakeside DFW….
We will have to wait to see if Bob’s prediction “thousands of apts in the Lakeside DFW area”.
If Bob is right, and THOUSANDS of apartments are built (that means approved and then constructed) “then all you doubters admit that I (Bob) was right”
You can view the Lakeside DFW concept plan online. No scoop…
www.lakesidedfw.com
Quote
 

Add comment


Thanks for your interest in commenting on our website. We encourage you to share your thoughts and opinions. To encourage stimulating and civil discussions, we ask that you adhere to the following guidelines: You agree, through your use of this website that you will not post any material which is false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise in violation of ANY law. Legal actions can be taken against you. CrossTimbersGazette.com is not responsible for the content posted on this forum. We do not warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information presented. The messages express the views of the author, not necessarily the views of CrossTimbersGazette.com. Anyone who feels that a posted message is objectionable is encouraged to notify an administrator immediately. We have the rights to remove objectionable content, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold harmless CrossTimbersGazette.com, its owner, parent company, subsidies and any related websites to this forum. We at CrossTimbersGazette.com also reserve the right to reveal your identity (or any information we have about you) in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any information posted by you. Once your comment is published, it can be found in search results on websites like Google and Yahoo. If you feel a comment violates the above guidelines, please notify us at http://www.crosstimbersgazette.com/index.php/contact.


Security code
Refresh

Facebook Share

Share on facebook
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner