Banner
Speed traps are not proper enforcement PDF Print E-mail
Written by Bob Weir   
Monday, 08 October 2012 00:00

Let me begin by saying something I learned a long time ago as a cop in New York City; you will never make someone happy by giving him/her a traffic ticket.

It doesn’t matter if you catch someone driving 20 miles over the speed limit, or you stop someone for driving an unregistered and uninspected vehicle. Most people believe in their hearts that they’re really not doing anything so evil that they should be subjected to punishment from some guy/gal in a uniform who suddenly popped up from behind shrubbery along the shoulder of the road.

Therefore, imagine a guy on his way to work one morning who didn’t notice that the speed limit on the main street in his town was recently lowered by 5 mph. He’s driving along, thinking about the challenges he’ll be facing that day, when suddenly he sees a police vehicle merging into the traffic from a hidden location just off the roadway. The roof lights go on and he realizes he’s the target. A quick check of his speed on the dashboard monitor tells him he’s only about 3 miles over the limit. However, the officer tells him he was in violation by 8 miles because of the recent change.

The motorist is issued a ticket that costs about $150, which might be his entire day’s pay. I don’t have to tell you how he’s going to feel about cops after that experience. I always loathed that part of the job because in the overwhelming number of cases the motorist is a decent, law-abiding guy who is supporting a family, paying his bills and doing his best to be a good citizen. The fact is; those qualities make him the perfect target for cities and towns that need to add more revenue to the treasury. The irresponsible lout, who’s always being stopped and who has a glove compartment filled with citations he never answered, is unlikely to answer this one either.

It should go without saying that we need to enforce traffic laws. But, the most important job of any police unit is crime prevention, not punishment. The best way to prevent crime is to project an image of omnipresence. Would-be violators are not about to break any laws while a police officer or a marked unit is in view.

We’ve all experienced the sudden chill of seeing a patrol car behind us, or seeing one parked along the median, causing us to let up on the gas pedal and tap the brakes. We may not like to succumb to authority, but we can understand and respect the need for it.

What people don’t respect is the image of a carefully shrouded unit peeking out from the shadows, ready to swoop down on a driver like a hawk preying on a field mouse. It may pump more money into the town coffers, but it is viewed by many as a scheme to rip off residents under the guise of traffic enforcement.

According to a new list compiled by the National Motorists Association (NMA), a drivers-rights advocacy organization, the worst speed traps in North America are in Flower Mound, Texas; Livonia, Michigan; and Windsor, Ontario, Canada. Being the number one speed trap in the continental United States is a dubious distinction at best. We must be a bunch of lawbreakers and drag-racers to merit that much attention to our driving habits.

Or, is it something else? According to that same NMA report, if the speed limit in an area changes four times in two miles and police cars can barely be seen lurking behind bridges and oversize shrubs, the writing is on the wall: You're in a speed trap!

Their official definition of a speed trap is “a spot that combines arbitrarily low speed limits with heavy traffic enforcement designed to generate ticket revenue.”  I’ve heard from several town residents who are concerned about what they believe is an overly aggressive campaign that seems to fit the above definition.

Although it’s axiomatic that most people never want to see the police until they need them, I would postulate that most people realize how vital those officers are to the security and safety of the community. Furthermore, I feel confident in saying that residents would have much more respect and admiration for the job done by their local officers if they didn’t feel like they were being badgered every time they started their engines.

Having our town at the top of the list of speed traps in the country is not exactly a proud achievement. On the contrary, it makes us look like a bunch of recidivists who need to be constantly spied upon. That’s not the Flower Mound I’ve come to know and love.

 

 

Comments  

 
+2 #8 James C. Walker 2012-10-18 08:29
Speed traps are only possible when the posted limits are deliberately set lower than the safety-optimum 85th percentile speed of free flowing traffic under good conditions. If the 85th percentile speed is 45 mph, the posted limit should be 45. If the posted limit is then set artificially and improperly low at 40, 35, 30, or 25 mph - then THAT wrongful setting alone facilitates a speed trap, AND lower safety.

The individual officers giving tickets versus the improper and less-safe too-low posted limits are NOT responsible for this predatory procedure.

Putting officers in this terrible position of issuing predatory speeding tickets for revenue undermines respect for traffic police, for traffic laws, and for the governments responsible.

See the science of the safest 85th percentile speed limits on our website.

James C. Walker, National Motorists Association, Ann Arbor, MI
Quote
 
 
+1 #7 DS 2012-10-16 09:44
Excellent article Bob!

As a resident of #3 on that list (Windsor, Canada) I have experienced exactly the scenarios you depicted. A few years ago I got a ticket where I even saw the officer but didn't realize I was speeding enough to get a ticket because the limit on the large, wide 4 lane road is only 30MPH, despite average traffic speeds of 40+MPH. $150 later and I'm on my way.
Quote
 
 
+2 #6 Delegating 2012-10-15 20:22
Yes, but after delegating, a good manager would look at the performance and make the appropriate adjustments as necesary.
Quote
 
 
0 #5 Bob Weir 2012-10-13 08:23
The Town Manager delegates responsibility to department heads such as police chief, fire chief, etc. he doesn't personally interfere with their judgment on issues relating to their subordinates. That's Management 101. Thanks Al DeMarzo for the affirmation. As a former law enforcement guy, you know how important it is for officers to have the support of the people in their efforts to protect and serve. Nothing loses that support faster than over-zealous traffic enforcement.
Quote
 
 
+4 #4 Malcomb X 2012-10-12 04:30
But Bob, You Said the Town Manager is Doing an Great Job. This is his responsibility. Which is it?
Quote
 
 
+3 #3 Al DeMarzo 2012-10-11 22:08
Well said, Lt. Ticketing should be a form of traffic control, not a method of either building town revenue, one's own resume or a method proving self worth. We're fortunate to have the boys and girls on our department and they should in turn, appreciate us as supporters. The funny thing is that you never know when you'll really need one of those supporters.
Quote
 
 
0 #2 GReed 2012-10-10 15:29
I agree completely. The town council needs to rethink the strategy of funding the budget by tickets. This is hurting our economic development.
Quote
 
 
+6 #1 BRoger 2012-10-08 22:25
great article. We need changes said the place you're not looked on is nearly revenue raisers. numerous neighbors and friends have reported the exact same feelings about the flower Mound Police Department. We deserve better they seem to be just to find their existence by writing tickets. I'm particularly disappointed in that I voted for the crime sales tax last time it came up. it was sold to us in that they were going to increase the number of patrols. they said nothing about funding a 6 person traffic enforcement section.
Quote
 

Add comment


Thanks for your interest in commenting on our website. We encourage you to share your thoughts and opinions. To encourage stimulating and civil discussions, we ask that you adhere to the following guidelines: You agree, through your use of this website that you will not post any material which is false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise in violation of ANY law. Legal actions can be taken against you. CrossTimbersGazette.com is not responsible for the content posted on this forum. We do not warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information presented. The messages express the views of the author, not necessarily the views of CrossTimbersGazette.com. Anyone who feels that a posted message is objectionable is encouraged to notify an administrator immediately. We have the rights to remove objectionable content, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold harmless CrossTimbersGazette.com, its owner, parent company, subsidies and any related websites to this forum. We at CrossTimbersGazette.com also reserve the right to reveal your identity (or any information we have about you) in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any information posted by you. Once your comment is published, it can be found in search results on websites like Google and Yahoo. If you feel a comment violates the above guidelines, please notify us at http://www.crosstimbersgazette.com/index.php/contact.


Security code
Refresh

Facebook Share

Share on facebook
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner