Banner
Flower Mound Gas Drilling Myths PDF Print E-mail
Written by Jodie Boutilier   
Tuesday, 24 April 2012 21:11

NFL (Northern, Filidoro and Lyda) are running for re-election.  Not much news here.  They are fixated on drawing the discussion back to gas drilling.  No one can blame them for that.  It worked so well for them in 2010.  Also, there is no denying that gas drilling and its related issues will be with Flower Mound for a long time to come. After all, Flower Mound sits on the Barnett Shale.

Limiting the debate to gas drilling as the NFL is attempting to do, is a disservice to Flower Mound residents.  It ignores our need for the quality economic development that will make it possible to improve our sales tax revenues and ease our property tax base burden.  It ignores the need to attract more quality jobs, housing options and desired retail and recreational opportunities.

Still, I don’t blame NFL for trying to focus on gas drilling.  What I have an issue with, is the myths about gas drilling, that they are using to do it.  As someone who has fought to improve the Oil and Gas Ordinance, served on the Oil and Gas Advisory Board, and served on the Oil and Gas Board of Appeals,  I would like to set the record straight on a number of these myths:

Myth #1 – Flower Mound does not have a Centralized Collection Facility (CCF)

False.  Williams has a CCF on Scenic Road.  It was approved in 2008.  No current candidate was involved in the approval of this facility (for details, see page 32 “centralized tank batteries compression facilities” at http://www.flower-mound.com/agenda/oil/oilminutes021308.pdf).  Town Council Members, including Al Filidoro, were informed of the O&G Board of Appeal approval during the 2/1/2008 Council meeting  (See Mayor and Town Council Liaison Reports at http://www.flower-mound.com/agenda/TCarchive/minutes_021808.pdf) . 

Myth #2 – NFL stopped the industrialization of Flower Mound

False.  Twenty-six (26) new gas wells and a new pad site on Hilliard have been approved since the NFL took office.  Gas wells that are put on previously approved pad sites are administratively approved in Flower Mound.

Myth #3 – The Hilliard Field pad site had to be approved

False.  There is room for a legal debate on this issue.  NFL campaigned saying they were not afraid of lawsuits yet allowed the Hilliard Field application to be administratively approved.  The issue is complicated because Hilliard’s final application to the town was submitted just hours before a moratorium was enacted and by controversial issues related to upland habitat destruction and tank battery variances.  A book could be written on the subject.   There is not a simple yes or no answer to this question, but since NFL campaigned on not being afraid of a lawsuit, don’t residents have the right to expect at least the appearance of a fight?

Myth #4 – NFL revoked the CCF and Pipeline Ordinances passed on January 21, 2010 because the ordinances laid the ground work for the industrialization of Flower Mound

False.  The regulatory framework from 1/21/10 was designed to protect Flower Mound from having another CCF approved without public input.  NFL supports this framework and voted in July of 2011 to keep it in the revised Oil and Gas and Pipeline Ordinances.

Myth #5   NFL always works in a transparent manner to protect Flower Mound from industrialization by gas drillers

False.  Just weeks after taking office, residents and at least two council members were given just 72 hours notice that something known as the Williams Settlement was on the agenda for the upcoming council meeting.  This settlement would have allowed Williams to expand their current CCF and revoke the CCF and Pipeline Ordinances passed on 1/21/10 (see Myth 4).  Without question, this settlement would have increased the industrialization of Flower Mound.  Councilman Hayden, seconded by Councilman Dixon, led the council to table this item, effectively killing it.

Gas drilling is and always will be a tough issue for Flower Mound.  Dealing with it honestly is the only way to lead Flower Mound forward.  Deliberately distorting the truth, as NFL and their supporters have done, will only deepen a destructive divide in our Town.

Many residents in Flower Mound want to vote for leaders they believe will best protect Flower Mound from gas drilling issues.  Who those leaders are is not as easy to determine as NFL would like voters to believe.  Before casting your vote, examine the facts and ask yourselves why would NFL not tell you the truth?


Jodie Boutilier
Flower Mound, TX

 

Comments  

 
-11 #34 Brent 2012-04-28 22:59
@PLEASE. Dude, you only need to see that one document to see Hayden lied! That's the point, not what he did or didn't do related to the Settlement. Did you really miss that point or are you just working a little spin on us.
Quote
 
 
+12 #33 Malcolm XXL 2012-04-28 19:25
Brent has been a busy boy, commenting on several articles and desperately trying to direct readers to a dying blog. I'm guessing that either Al is paying him a buck for each post or Brent is really Lyda (and maybe Al is paying him a buck for each post).
Quote
 
 
+13 #32 Please 2012-04-28 18:06
So now we are relying on magic documents that aren't presented except for one email that is in response to the Town Attorney and most likely did not come as the result of a PIR.

Sorry it looks to me like the guy is just doing his job - what do you want him to do sit in the corner and pout when the NFL goes off on a crazy tangent? Of course not he needed to work to get the agreement the best it can be in case he lost the fight and the thing past.

Thankfully Tom got the whole thing canned. Thank you Mr. Hayden
Quote
 
 
+13 #31 New Low 2012-04-28 17:47
Again make a PIR on Monday about any topic you want that has been discussed in open session. Its not the rule that has been used in the past here. Maybe its just special rules for special people. Something the NFL is very very good at.
Quote
 
 
-15 #30 Brent 2012-04-28 17:06
Everyone should read this article on Flower Mound Citizens Against Urban Drilling. It takes a part these arguments one by one with facts and data. On another subject but one also covered in the article - I am still dumbfounded that Hayden would lie like he did. He had to know others had documentation that proved he was lying. What is up with this guy? I feel like so much has changed with him in the last year.
http://stopthedrilling.blogspot.com/2012/04/weve-come-long-way-baby.html
Quote
 
 
-12 #29 @New Low 2012-04-28 14:05
It's in the public domain after it has been discussed in an open, public meeting. Please educate before you make a knee-jerk comment that is both false and inflamatory.
Quote
 
 
+10 #28 New Low 2012-04-28 13:23
@Matt M. an email is in response to the Town Attorney is always assumed to be privileged unless the Attorney General says its not. Do a PIR request for emails between the Town Attorney and any council member or staff on Monday and see what happens.

NFL did this illegally and it reflects on them alone and not anyone else.

Again, nice how they ask everyone to depend on documents no one has ever seen and on their own special interpretation of someone else's statement.
Quote
 
 
-12 #27 Matt M. 2012-04-28 08:52
http://stopthedrilling.blogspot.com/2012/04/weve-come-long-way-baby.html

The email does not look attorney/client to me. Isn't Hayden and Stephenson always asking for transparency? Oh I get it, Hayden and Stephenson have special rules when it comes to transparency.
Quote
 
 
+11 #26 Just wondering 2012-04-28 07:58
Again I have to ask...is the title of "council member" really worth sinking this low and putting the Town at risk by giving this hate blog (Fmcaud) that email? NFL= Not For Long
Quote
 
 
+12 #25 New Low 2012-04-28 06:31
NFL has sunk to a new low. They released documents to Tammi Vijda for a "truth" post on her blog. The documents in question, if they in fact exist, are no doubt attorney client privilege since they deal with negotiations with Williams on legal matters. So now they are willing to sacrifice the Town's legal positions outright to try and save their skin.

She only tells you what is in them(she didn't post them) except for one document. An email response from Hayden that is not to all of council in response to Terry Welch (anyone who has ever done a public information request to the Town knows emails like that are not released because they are also considered attorney client privilege). We really have no idea if what Vijda says in her post is true since we don't have access to the documents she mentions. For Flower Mound's sake, I hope we never do. Documents are attorney client privilege for a reason. Will NFL stop at nothing to try and get re-elected.
Quote
 

Add comment


Thanks for your interest in commenting on our website. We encourage you to share your thoughts and opinions. To encourage stimulating and civil discussions, we ask that you adhere to the following guidelines: You agree, through your use of this website that you will not post any material which is false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise in violation of ANY law. Legal actions can be taken against you. CrossTimbersGazette.com is not responsible for the content posted on this forum. We do not warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information presented. The messages express the views of the author, not necessarily the views of CrossTimbersGazette.com. Anyone who feels that a posted message is objectionable is encouraged to notify an administrator immediately. We have the rights to remove objectionable content, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold harmless CrossTimbersGazette.com, its owner, parent company, subsidies and any related websites to this forum. We at CrossTimbersGazette.com also reserve the right to reveal your identity (or any information we have about you) in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any information posted by you. Once your comment is published, it can be found in search results on websites like Google and Yahoo. If you feel a comment violates the above guidelines, please notify us at http://www.crosstimbersgazette.com/index.php/contact.


Security code
Refresh

Facebook Share

Share on facebook
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner