Banner
Air tests detect methane plume in Flower Mound PDF Print E-mail
Thursday, 04 March 2010 16:24

A team of environmental scientists presented findings Wednesday from a two day emissions gas detection project showing methane levels as much as 20 times above normal background levels in the air around a gas drilling operation in Flower Mound and other areas.

Methane is a surrogate gas for benzene, xylene and other toxic and carcinogenic volatile organic compounds (VOCs), according to Wilma Subra, an environmental chemist.  More tests will be forthcoming to determine if those compounds were present.

"These findings raise troubling questions about shale gas industry pollution not only in Texas but for states nationwide where shale gas drilling and production is planned or underway," said Subra.

The results were collected over the past two days by an undercover team driving an unmarked white van around the area to test a new measurement technology that enables drive-by emissions testing on shale gas drilling and pumping facilities - without leaving the vehicle or slowing down from normal driving speeds.

The sampling team included Subra and environmental testing firm Wolf Eagle Environmental of Flower Mound.

In one area of west Flower Mound near a Williams drilling site on Scenic Drive, concentrations of methane from emissions plumes were so high that the instrument - manufactured by Picarro Inc. - reached the higher end of its detection range at 40-50 parts per million.

When Subra and Wolf Eagle Environmental CEO Alisa Rich contacted air quality regulators, they said that they learned that the Flower Mound facility had failed to report an emissions event, as required by state and federal law.

"These jaw-dropping results show that the shale gas industry is not to be trusted with public health", said Sharon Wilson, organizer for the Texas Oil & Gas Accountability Project.

Williams spokesman Kelly Swan said that the site on Scenic Drive in Flower Mound checked out okay previously.

"Already this year, experts have tested the air quality on three separate occasions at the west Flower Mound site where we operate natural gas compressors in enclosed structures," said Swan.

"All three tests show that the air around our site is well within the parameters of state requirements. On two occasions, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality conducted tests during unannounced visits to the site. We initiated the third test – conducted by W&M Environmental Group, a Plano-based independent contractor – to provide further assurance about the air quality at this site. We are pleased with the results of all three tests and will continue our efforts to proactively protect the air quality at our facilities in Flower Mound."

 

Comments  

 
+4 #6 2010-03-06 16:55
And Chris, how exactly would your friend Alyssa know if Williams failed to report anything? TCEQ isn't monitoring their wells. It's called self-reporting for a reason.

Please stop feeding us Williams' talking points.
Quote
 
 
-2 #5 2010-03-06 13:40
I called my friend Alyssa Taylor Director of Air Quality Region 4 for the TECQ and she told me Williams has never failed to report an emissions event, and went on to say that they were out on site on the 4 of March with test equipment and did not find any problems. The TRC also was on site on the 4th of March and found Williams to be in compliance.
Quote
 
 
-2 #4 2010-03-05 17:51
Flower Mound Responds to Methane Report

http://www.flower-mound.com/news/news.php#methane030510
Quote
 
 
+2 #3 2010-03-05 11:14
Mark, I'm not sure who appointed you test-verification cop (apparently it was a self-appointment), but perhaps you should have attended the presentation in Dish the other night to hear it for yourself. But I understand your position. It's much easier to snipe from the sidelines than to actually listen to what people have found; then jump to the conclusion that the test must be faulty and biased.

I hope and expect that the Flower Mound Town Council will request a presentation from the experts who conducted the test, much like all the presentations we've seen from Williams and its consultants. By the time of the next Council meeting, they should have results back from the lab tests, which will tell us what other VOCs were present along with the methane, if any. Wouldn't it make sense for the council to request such a presentation, rather than giving someone 3 minutes during the public comment time?
Quote
 
 
-5 #2 2010-03-05 10:29
There may be a couple of issues with your test. 1. How far away from the station were you, 2. Unless it was a test standing still or recalibrates on the go, it could affect your test quality, 3. Given there are gas wells in the area, you cannot guarantee whether the methane came from the wells or the compressor, 4. If not the compressor, that means they might have an issue somewhere else, 5. Driving around with numerous cars and trucks on the road could also affect the results of your test, 6. I would be curious to see the test results, while some sweeping statements where made, I would like to see specific locations of each test, time of day, was there more that one test in each area, how were the instruments calibrated, and could I see those calibrations to have them checked. It may be entirely possible there is an issue, but unless some of these issues are isolated and resolved the results of the tests may be comprised.
Quote
 
 
+4 #1 2010-03-05 10:21
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has no permissible exposure limit for methane, but the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's (NIOSH) maximum recommended safe methane concentration for mine workers during an 8-hour period is 1,000 ppm (0.1 percent). Methane levels 50,000 ppm to 150,000 ppm is considered potentially explosive. www.cdc.gov www.cdc.gov/niosh
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Facebook Share

Share on facebook
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner