Banner
Flower Mound mayor speaks out on town manager PDF Print E-mail
Wednesday, 03 October 2012 21:56

The future of Flower Mound Town Manager Harlan Jefferson's employment with the town is uncertain almost two weeks after he was placed on paid administrative leave by town council on Sept. 22. Flower Mound Mayor Tom Hayden recently sat down with The Cross Timbers Gazette to discuss the situation with Jefferson and debunk some rumors.

CTG: Some people are saying that Jefferson’s pending departure is somehow related to the proposed Lakeside Development.

TH: It’s not about any one development project.  It’s about what we can do to put our town into a position to succeed.  We had a survey done in 2007 for the people who do business with our town.  We received low marks in being a place where businesses want to come and do development.  We had a second survey in 2012 and again we got low marks.  It’s not that our Town Manager isn’t aware of this.  We’ve talked about this for years both independently and collectively.  And we want it to change. 

CTG: There is speculation that other members of the town’s staff may lose their jobs at the hands of town council.  Is there any truth to that?

TH: There are four people who work for the town council: The Municipal Judge, the Town Manager, the Town Secretary and the Town Attorney.  If anybody says that somebody is going to get fired by council, they haven’t read our Town Charter.  Our job is to say to the Town Manager, “This is the direction we want our town to go.”  It’s up to the Town Manager to do the implementation.  Our job is to provide the goals and the objectives; their job is to provide the implementation.  The Town Manager will decide who they need on their staff to achieve and accomplish those goals.

CTG: Why is town council looking to make a change in leadership?

TH: One of the strengths that Harlan has is a strong financial background and it served the town very well over the last six years.  However, we have to figure out ways to grow the top line.  We want to make some changes because we told our residents that we want to give them more opportunities for things to do in Flower Mound.  We also want to be able to pay our staff members competitive salaries.  At some point, we don’t want to be forced to have to raise property taxes.  Our tax base is primarily based on aging residential housing stock.  If we don’t do things to diversify our tax base, ultimately we will not be able to maintain town services or add amenities in the future.  So we are at a point in time where we want someone with a different perspective.  Mr. Jefferson has worked for the town of Flower Mound for the last 15 years and this is the way that things have always been done.  We want a fresh perspective. 

CTG: Will a possible settlement with Jefferson have a significant financial impact on the town?

TH: I don’t know what the outcome is going to be regarding any type of severance for Mr. Jefferson.  Nothing has been settled yet.  I will tell you that a year from now the town’s reserve fund will be higher than it is today.  Any settlement will not leave the town in a financial quagmire. 

CTG: Anything else you would like to add?

TH: This is not easy for anybody on town council.  Nobody on council likes what we are going through.  No one on council has any personal malice towards Harlan Jefferson, he is a very nice person.  What’s being considered at the moment is to put Flower Mound in the best position for the future.

 

 

Comments  

 
+1 #21 @@elaine 2012-10-06 21:26
Both of you believe that you speak for the majority. Perhaps you should review the results of the last election - the anti crowd was voted out by over 60%.
Quote
 
 
+2 #20 @ Elaine Barry 2012-10-06 16:32
You hit the nail on the head. This council needs to get past their Southlake envy or move there. Couldn't be soon enough, but unfortanetly it maybe too late for our lovely community.
Quote
 
 
+7 #19 Elaine Barry 2012-10-05 15:30
Watching this Council during meetings you would think that their most important job was to focus on development & that we're a desperate town consigned to an investor's "no list".
That couldn't be further from the truth. Sure we might not be able to attract a manufacturing business that's dependent on a railroad or a huge store that needs to locate on a major highway, but we can and have certainly attracted some quality stores and businesses. Our southern business district's proximity to the airport is valuable. Some point to Grapevine's entertainment and tourist attractions with envy but the fact is we all could have moved there if that's the environment we wanted. We are a blessed, beautiful town with a Master Plan designed by many and important to most of us.
Quote
 
 
+16 #18 WhosWrong? 2012-10-05 14:23
@Jim

We all know what happens to former councilpersons with dirty laundry. They get unanimously appointed to open council seats!
Quote
 
 
+6 #17 To, Interested 2012-10-05 13:03
When do builders and developers ever NOT complain about those who would be charged with holding their feet to the fire, ethically upholding the Master Plan and town ordinances. Like others have said, if they want to go a different direction then share that with the all the citizens that they were elected to represent, not just a few special interests that they owe, and pursue an ordinance change.
Quote
 
 
+8 #16 Amen to #s 3-7 & 10 2012-10-05 12:00
Do builders and developers ever NOT complain about those that would hold their feet to the fire to follow the master plan and ordinances;i.e. are ethical enough to refuse to cave to the pressure brought by those trying to fulfill their promises to satisfy their supporters.
Quote
 
 
+11 #15 Bob Weir 2012-10-05 09:52
To "Interested." If you want to criticize me by name, then at least have the courage to use your own name. I have no problem praising or criticizing current and former politicians when I agree or disagree with them, and I don't hide behind pseudonyms. That posture is known as integrity. If you're proud of what you're writing, then put your name in front of it. There's no credibility in anonymity.
Quote
 
 
-2 #14 Jim 2012-10-05 09:28
Quoting WhosWrong?:
If the mayor is looking to fire people for doing something wrong he needs to look at his own people.

http://www.ethics.state.tx.us/sworncomp/2011/31105145.pdf


No one claimed he's doing something wrong. And your big discovery, it's as laughable as you bringing it up hiding behind a fake name claiming it's somehow relevant to the Town Manager situation. Nice try, but you failed. Do you want to start airing the dirty laundry of previous council members, the ones you're likely snuggled up to? They'd likely say no, in a cold sweat...
Quote
 
 
+6 #13 Amen to #s 3-7 & 10 2012-10-04 22:25
Is it true that our Council has hired outside legal and public relations firms?
If so why, who and for how much of our tax dollars? I guess any one can figure out why they need PR help -- trying to spin their costly, unwise decisions. Hmm, more of that lipstick? Is it sticking?
I wish Mayor Hayden would elaborate on how our new CFO can increase or even maintain our reserves, given the wrongful termination and/or huge severances we're going to incur; lowering fees to developers; and increasing infrastructure costs. My 15 hrs of acctg says NOT. Not without an increase in property valuations and/or a tax rate hike. Oh, yeah, stupid me -- many of these won't hit the books until projects are built and lawsuits have traveled thru the legal system at least twice. Let a subsequent administration deal with it!
Quote
 
 
+15 #12 @ WhosWrong? 2012-10-04 20:13
The citizens of Flower Mound may never know who all contributed to Mrs. Stephenson's 2011 campaign, but it's not that hard to figure out.
Quote
 

Add comment


Thanks for your interest in commenting on our website. We encourage you to share your thoughts and opinions. To encourage stimulating and civil discussions, we ask that you adhere to the following guidelines: You agree, through your use of this website that you will not post any material which is false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise in violation of ANY law. Legal actions can be taken against you. CrossTimbersGazette.com is not responsible for the content posted on this forum. We do not warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information presented. The messages express the views of the author, not necessarily the views of CrossTimbersGazette.com. Anyone who feels that a posted message is objectionable is encouraged to notify an administrator immediately. We have the rights to remove objectionable content, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold harmless CrossTimbersGazette.com, its owner, parent company, subsidies and any related websites to this forum. We at CrossTimbersGazette.com also reserve the right to reveal your identity (or any information we have about you) in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any information posted by you. Once your comment is published, it can be found in search results on websites like Google and Yahoo. If you feel a comment violates the above guidelines, please notify us at http://www.crosstimbersgazette.com/index.php/contact.


Security code
Refresh

Facebook Share

Share on facebook
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner