Banner
This is how democracy is supposed to work PDF Print E-mail
Written by Bob Weir   
Friday, 15 March 2013 00:00

They began arriving about an hour early for the regularly scheduled Planning & Zoning meeting at Flower Mound Town Hall last Monday evening. The meeting began promptly at 6:30 p.m., as a packed house, including several rows of chairs that were set up in the lobby, began hearing from representatives of Children’s Learning Adventure, a 26,000 square foot daycare center planned for development at the northeast corner of FM 3040 and Morris Road.

Residents from Tealwood Oaks, the neighborhood just behind the planned development, were there en masse and prepared to speak out against what they believed would become a traffic and safety nightmare caused by the facility that has a capacity of more than 500 children, which is greater than some of the elementary schools in town. Add to that the fact that about 270 trees would have to be cut down and you have the perfect storm to arouse the ire of a family-oriented town that has been honored with the environmental accolade, “Tree City USA.”

After the applicant spoke, requesting a zoning change on the irregularly-shaped lot, a few representatives of the concerned residents articulated the reasons for their opposition. I’ve seldom seen or heard such well-researched and documented facts and statistics than was presented by those speakers. Initial presenters were followed by many other residents, who took to the microphone to add their comments. They did so with passion, but with respect for the commission members, whose role is to vote on the item before passing it on to the town council for final judgment. 

It’s important to point out that the opposition wasn’t limited to homeowners in close proximity to the proposed development. People from other subdivisions in town came out to support their fellow residents. Such a display of solidarity is another hallmark of our town, because it indicates that the people here are not so selfish as to only take a stand when it concerns their singular slice of real estate. Paul Stone, a friend and fellow resident, added his esteemed reputation to the issue when he rose to speak against the project. Carol Kohankie, another prominent name in our town, was similarly opposed and waited patiently for her name to be called so she could weigh in on the inanity of such a development. Speaking of prominent names, former Flower Mound Mayor Melissa Northern also stepped up to the mic to register her dissatisfaction with, among other things, the traffic safety ramifications of the project.

It’s axiomatic that the best areas in which to live are those where people have an abiding interest in the future of their communities, and it’s the main reason why our town is rated so highly in magazines across the state and country as a most desirable place to raise a family. Think about this; if the P & Z had opened their meeting to an empty room, except for the appearance of the applicant, what odds would you give that the proposal would be voted down, as it ultimately was?

The advisory board has many other items coming before it every second week. Commissioners put in many hours studying the items coming up for discussion, and they do it as a public service because, like the Town Council, they don’t get paid. Hence, no matter how much research they did on their own, the chances are pretty good that they’d never have the time to explore all the reasons why such a project should be rejected. This is precisely why it’s so vital for people to be vigilant in their communities and sound the alarm to neighbors when danger looms nearby.

It was evident that P & Z members were impressed with the turnout because, as a few of them told me privately, it was well beyond what they usually encounter. After listening to all the pros and cons, they took a short break before returning with some thoughts about the controversial item. Each member spelled out their reasons for voting no, many of them citing the fact that the applicant had not used due diligence in meeting with the residents of the area to discuss elements of the planned development. The evening was a classic lesson in the way democracy is supposed to work. We can’t have an election to decide every significant issue. But, as long as we have prudent reps who listen to the concerns of their constituents, the system works.

On Thursday, the reps from the childcare center requested a postponement before bringing their case to the Town Council, undoubtedly so they can do some damage control. One can never be certain how the Town Council will vote, so we’ll just have to wait until it comes before them and hope they see it the way the P & Z did.


Bob Weir is a long-time Flower Mound resident and former local newspaper editor.

 

 

Comments  

 
0 #13 @@interesting 2013-03-23 06:19
you and at least four others have a reading comprehension problem. The quote WAS made by the CEO of Children's Learning Adventure and that is why he said "we decided to proceed."

Go back and re-read Interesting's comment. They were asking which town officials from Flower Mound encouraged CLA to go through the process.
Quote
 
 
0 #12 sandy brake 2013-03-22 21:41
Note to CTG: Your once noble paper has just turned WIERD.
Quote
 
 
+4 #11 @interesting 2013-03-22 16:25
Quoting Interesting:
However, after our initial meeting with town officials, who assured us that the new council and mayor were business friendly and looking to attract investment, we decided to proceed with our application.


You sound like the applicant for CLA - which is fine. "we decided to proceed" tells us everything. The town made no guarantees and I would guess town officials probably gave "are you sure" feedback often.
Quote
 
 
-2 #10 Interesting 2013-03-22 16:03
"The families and children of Flower Mound lost last night," Sodja stated. "We had been warned by our consultants that Flower Mound was a difficult environment - very unfriendly to business - and many advised us to look elsewhere to invest. However, after our initial meeting with town officials, who assured us that the new council and mayor were business friendly and looking to attract investment, we decided to proceed with our application. The company spent almost a year and tens of thousands of dollars working to meet the neighbors and town requests [but] to no avail."

This quote was made by the CEO of Children's Learning Adventure in the The Flower Mound Leader after the denial by Town Council. Wonder which "Town officials" encouraged them to build in Flower Mound? Especially in an area that required an amendment to the Master Plan?
Quote
 
 
+3 #9 @horse patootie 2013-03-22 15:36
Horse you make it sound as if thats a bad thing, that residence that have to live next to it daily might have more valuable input than the owner that lives in Italy (according the the representative at TC). While FM has gotten more "business friendly", which I don't think is a good thing, the ECC PZ and TC all agreed this was a bad idea *based off the lot size, shape, and current track flow*. No ones saying business isn't welcome in FM, only that it needs to be smart. In this case another business that we already had fighting over a finite resource was going to be building a child care place on a plot much to small between a high pressure gas line and a high speed intersection. Sound like thats best for children or the town?
Quote
 
 
+4 #8 @good point 2013-03-18 05:02
What are you reading? Here is the link to the p&z packet for all who you tried to mislead: http://www.flower-mound.com/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/03112013-471
Nowhere in there is a recommendation that is geared to saving developers money. You will find recommendations that are geared to saving staff time (that saves FM residents money since we pay their salaries). In phase 2 you will find a recommondentati on that staff review items required for each phase in the development process to make sure they are needed and required at the appropriate time. All of this is fairly basic process improvement.
As for who is going to be looking out for the residents - the professional staff we pay to review these very technical documents. We don't have many engineers on P&Z. Staff lets P&Z know if there are issues with the technical studies not vice versa.
Quote
 
 
-4 #7 @skeptic 2013-03-17 18:23
When you invest in your home it is your responsibility to check on the zoning of the surrounding property. The person that owns that property is entitled to build in accordance with the zoning. I don't know enough about this case, but often in Flower Mound the adjacent residents come out screaming about something that it is illegal for the town to stop if the zoning is adhered to.
Quote
 
 
+2 #6 @skeptic 2013-03-17 15:37
There is ALWAYS someone that will impacted.
Quote
 
 
+12 #5 Skeptic 2013-03-16 21:43
@Horse's
The vocal minority in this instance happens to be a majority of homeowners directly impacted by this ill conceived plan. They are also investors, who have in many cases their life's savings in their homes.
Quote
 
 
-8 #4 horse patootie 2013-03-16 21:03
This is not what I would call democracy. This is once again a potential FM investor that is at odds with a vocal minority. He may as well pack up and leave or alternatively fire his staff and get the people of FM do to the market research, facility design, etc.
Quote
 

Add comment


Thanks for your interest in commenting on our website. We encourage you to share your thoughts and opinions. To encourage stimulating and civil discussions, we ask that you adhere to the following guidelines: You agree, through your use of this website that you will not post any material which is false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise in violation of ANY law. Legal actions can be taken against you. CrossTimbersGazette.com is not responsible for the content posted on this forum. We do not warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information presented. The messages express the views of the author, not necessarily the views of CrossTimbersGazette.com. Anyone who feels that a posted message is objectionable is encouraged to notify an administrator immediately. We have the rights to remove objectionable content, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold harmless CrossTimbersGazette.com, its owner, parent company, subsidies and any related websites to this forum. We at CrossTimbersGazette.com also reserve the right to reveal your identity (or any information we have about you) in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any information posted by you. Once your comment is published, it can be found in search results on websites like Google and Yahoo. If you feel a comment violates the above guidelines, please notify us at http://www.crosstimbersgazette.com/index.php/contact.


Security code
Refresh

Facebook Share

Share on facebook
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner