Banner
Flower Mound and the LISD PDF Print E-mail
Written by Tom Hayden   
Thursday, 07 February 2013 12:50

On Friday, February 8, the Flower Mound Town Council will consider a resolution that expresses many of the concerns our residents have communicated to the Council regarding the proposed elementary and middle school rezoning.  As both the LISD and the Town of Flower Mound have explained, the two are separate in nature, with different taxing authority, governing bodies and missions; however, many of our residents have implored us to be part of the communication efforts as they have justifiably expressed we are inexplicably intertwined.  This is difficult to argue when the most important reason given why families consider Flower Mound is the quality education provided by our schools.

As the Committee reviews its final recommendations, one aspect that cannot be ignored is the impact the schools play on the communities they serve.  In all Flower Mound neighborhoods, the hub of interaction revolves around the schools in that area.  While it is important to provide the highest product inside the classroom, the impact outside the classroom must also be considered. The bonding of friendships among children, as well as their parents, is a major driver in a successful community.  If the spirit of community is interrupted or separated, does this hinder the long term desirability of a particular neighborhood and ultimately impact the success of a school?  It is often said a home is not about walls, but the interaction of the people inside.  The same could be said about a school and a neighborhood.  How does a child interact and form lasting bonds when a major state highway may separate one another.

This leads to another concern voiced by our residents.  Geographic boundaries are often identified by major obstacles.  States and countries are many times separated by rivers, and to the greatest extent possible, educational zones consider major roadways.  This was accomplished in the high school zones with FM 1171 being the divider between Marcus and Flower Mound High, and perhaps a similar boundary should be a considered in this instance.  FM 2499 currently averages over 60,000 car counts a day and is the busiest road in Flower Mound.  With the north section of FM 2499 connecting with I-35 and the final completion of the DFW connector, the traffic can only be expected to increase.  A decade from now, daily car counts approaching 100,000 a day on FM 2499 are certainly a possibility.

While overcapacity and under-capacity are certainly drivers when considering educational zones, the long term capacity considerations are certainly the most important.  While it has been pointed out that several of the schools in Wellington are “near capacity”, studies sponsored by the LISD show this problem self correcting in the next two to three years.  Correcting a short term problem with a decision that has long term implications has never proven to be successful.  Addressing the underutilization at Forestwood, to use one of Steve Dixon’s favorite statements, perhaps “outside the box” considerations should be employed.  Currently Forestwood’s student population is just under 650 students, and a desired population of 750 to 800 would be optimal. 

One option would be to consider transporting students from new neighborhoods such as Lakeside, where residents know going in which schools their children will be attending while limiting the impact to existing neighborhoods.

Rather than mandating rezoning, perhaps the committee could help the LISD and the Town of Flower Mound develop suggestions that would promote voluntary rezoning.  This previous Monday I was unaware, but quickly learned that “magnet schools” or “charter schools” is not always the favorite terms of some educators.  That thought aside, we should focus on what we can do to make Forestwood a school that is so outstanding that people are beating down the doors to get in, voluntarily adding 100 additional students.  Maybe the solution is adding additional resources to make Forestwood the most technologically advanced school in the area, and/or the town considering re-budgeting our funding priorities to add additional trail connections so more students can ride their bikes and connect with the school.  We could also consider refreshing the park that is behind the school or adding up-to-date sports fields.  I personally don’t have the answers, but am confident that the decision making bodies, if working together could find solutions. 

While I certainly cannot speak for the other members of Council, I know each of them well enough that if reasonable proposals are presented, they will all bend over backwards to help preserve our community.  We seek a collaborative relationship with the LISD, and we encourage the committee to consider ideas where we as a Town and the LISD can work together to solve problems.  Because at the end of the day, we are all inexplicably intertwined.

 

Comments  

 
-18 #8 ImpartialObserver 2013-02-08 12:17
An excellent essay that puts into perspective many different considerations regarding a very complex issue. The assertion that the approval of "new housing developments" by the current Mayor and council is the genesis of this re-zoning controversy, given that not a single slab has been poured related to any "new housing development" approved by this council, is either misguided or an attempt to politicize a non-issue. This council has been seated for less than a year and the "new developments" they hope to bring to FloMo are in their infancy. Some may feel that a resolution from the council in support of its citizenry is not "politically expedient" but an action that honors its constituents as opposed to capitulating to a body whose interest is much broader and less focused on FloMo. That said, I have little doubt that LISD and its board feel they are acting fairly and in the best interst of education. Reasonable people can disagree.
Quote
 
 
+1 #7 Skeptic 2013-02-08 10:28
@ FM Politics: it was actually very clever of Ms Kyer to bring the information out when she did. I would not be surprised if there was a FOI request submitted for just such communication..just a hunch.
By making it public the way she did she diffuses the situation and spreads the political cost around.
It would have come to light eventually.
Quote
 
 
-5 #6 Too much 2013-02-08 10:09
This is a case of the mayor wanting to be and do everything for everyone. He needs to chose wisely the issues that he interjects himself into. If not he will be the politico who cried wolf and no one will take him seriously on anything.
Quote
 
 
+14 #5 FMPolitics 2013-02-07 20:01
@poor leadership It was poor leadership for the school board pres. to walk in a council meeting and try and blame the mayor for a decision that is clearly the responsibility of LISD. LISD needs to step up and take ownership of their decisions - good and bad.
Quote
 
 
-15 #4 Poor leadership 2013-02-07 15:20
This resolution is useless and is only being considered by FM council out of fear and political expediency. The LISD board does not pass resolutions to give direction to its member cities about zoning or whatever other city issues. Town business is complicated enough. If the mayor wants to make these decisions, let him resign and run for the school board.
Quote
 
 
+5 #3 Therese Pfeifer 2013-02-07 14:39
Thank you, Mayor Hayden. I hope that you have sent a copy of this to the superintendent, all LISD Board members, and all boundary committee members.
Quote
 
 
+15 #2 Mike Brown 2013-02-07 14:19
We in the ReThink the ReZone group are imploring LISD to stop and give this issue a fresh look. Quite simply, the manner in which our district has gone about this process has divided our community. We appreciate Mayor Hayden's letter, and are hopeful that a meaningful and clear resolution can be adopted by city council.
- Mike Brown www.rethinktherezone.com
Quote
 
 
-28 #1 TooLat 2013-02-07 13:56
I heard that the reason LISD is rezoning is because the mayor is approving new housing developments all the time. If that is the case the town should pay the bills for the schools.
Quote
 

Add comment


Thanks for your interest in commenting on our website. We encourage you to share your thoughts and opinions. To encourage stimulating and civil discussions, we ask that you adhere to the following guidelines: You agree, through your use of this website that you will not post any material which is false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise in violation of ANY law. Legal actions can be taken against you. CrossTimbersGazette.com is not responsible for the content posted on this forum. We do not warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information presented. The messages express the views of the author, not necessarily the views of CrossTimbersGazette.com. Anyone who feels that a posted message is objectionable is encouraged to notify an administrator immediately. We have the rights to remove objectionable content, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold harmless CrossTimbersGazette.com, its owner, parent company, subsidies and any related websites to this forum. We at CrossTimbersGazette.com also reserve the right to reveal your identity (or any information we have about you) in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any information posted by you. Once your comment is published, it can be found in search results on websites like Google and Yahoo. If you feel a comment violates the above guidelines, please notify us at http://www.crosstimbersgazette.com/index.php/contact.


Security code
Refresh

Facebook Share

Share on facebook
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner