Banner
Don’t mess with our schools! PDF Print E-mail
Written by Bob Weir   
Wednesday, 06 February 2013 17:00

The latest imbroglio to cause an eruption of passion in Flower Mound is the fear that the Lewisville Independent School District is preparing to rezone children from one school to another, a move that not only would create disruption of travel patterns for students and parents, but has the potential to put some children in danger.

The reason for concern stems from the possibility that some students would be forced to cross over busy intersections that are tough enough for adults to navigate, let alone youngsters who have had little or no experience dodging traffic. Newspaper stories and blog posts have been actively keeping this issue alive as parents with school age children become informed and, in some cases, outraged.

A February 4th Flower Mound Town Council meeting was well-attended by mothers and fathers who made it clear that they were not happy with what they viewed as a threat to their children’s safety. You may be wondering why they’re bringing their concerns to Council members instead of the members of the LISD board, where most people believe such decisions are made. Mayor Tom Hayden made it clear in his remarks that “The Flower Mound Council doesn’t determine where kids go to school.”

However, at that same Council meeting, LISD Board President Carol Kyer had some thoughts on the subject during Presentation and Update from LISD (Item G3 on the town’s video for that date): “I was originally asked to speak regarding the involvement of the Town Council and the administration on the current rezoning process. I was going to point out that the town doesn't have any say in our school, in the zoning process which Mayor Hayden just pointed out. After I reviewed my emails from the past 6 months, I was wrong and that I couldn't, in good faith, say that. An email was sent to me and (LISD Board Member) Kathy Duke from Mayor Hayden requesting that something be done about the over-crowding at McKamy in which he included the whole Town Council and that was on August 12, 2012. So with that I had forwarded to (LISD Superintendant) Dr. Waddell, thus starting the process of yes the town did have some kind of say with the start of this rezoning process."

Okay, so there appears to be some contradiction about the town’s role in this very volatile issue. Yet, to be fair, I don’t think an email request about overcrowding at one school is tantamount to fixing blame for the move toward rezoning. Presumably, Council receives emails all the time from parents that have issues with the schools. Forwarding them to the school board seems innocuous enough. Nevertheless, given the level of concern in the community, it’s not hard to imagine that the Mayor had no idea that his short message would come back to bite him and others on the Council.

It pains me to point out that all issues arising a few months before an election have the momentum of a boulder rolling down a steep slope. Therefore, it’s a good idea to separate the wheat from the chaff.  If the decisions of the Town Council had anything to do with rezoning it would come from changes to the Master Plan and SMARTGrowth that allow increased residential density, not from an email message. When town staff forwards statistics that project future growth estimates, LISD and other entities must make preparations to handle the needs that will be required for the expansion. 

Whether or not residents think that makes the Council culpable depends on how they view Council decisions which may have, perhaps inadvertently, impacted the zoning process. Like a pebble tossed in a pond, an event that seems small can have consequences that ripple through a community and cause a disturbance that wasn’t envisioned.

I’ve always been very proud of this town because of the many residents who get involved in shaping our future. They are the primary reason for the high marks the town receives when magazines rate desirable places to live. Keep in mind, quality schools are at the top of those lists. If there’s one thing you don’t dare mess with, it is responsible parents who care deeply about the safety and education of their children. Consequently, in the best interests of all those families that moved here because of our great quality of life, the Council has an obligation to use any influence they can muster to resolve this vexing situation as quickly and prudently as possible. Meanwhile, those who want to learn more about it and perhaps join in the dialogue can check with the town at www.flower-mound.com or with the school district at www.lisd.net


Bob Weir is a long-time Flower Mound resident and former local newspaper editor.

 

 

 

Comments  

 
+7 #5 Bob Weir 2013-02-07 14:01
The intent of my column was not to point an accusatory finger at the current town leaders, but to illustrate what may become a necessary adjustment to the school attendance figures in years to come. Notwithstanding those few people who may embrace inertia as a way of life, it’s axiomatic that cities and towns must have the capacity to grow and prosper. And, if last year’s town election is any indication (see first sentence of last post), most voters agree with that assertion. Hence, in the category of “you can’t have your cake and eat it too,” we must understand that growth doesn’t happen in a vacuum. As more developments are built and inhabited by families with school age children, our educational institutions will be affected. Either we inhibit growth and stagnate, or we encourage growth and deal with its ramifications as positively as possible.
Quote
 
 
+6 #4 Bob Weir 2013-02-07 13:58
The Flower Mound Town Council made their intentions very clear during the campaign last year, and they were voted in by a wide margin. At the time, school rezoning was not an issue. It’s difficult to conclude that 7 or 8 months of decision-making had such a hefty impact on the school attendance numbers throughout LISD. There hasn’t been enough time to build residential developments that would add schoolchildren to the equation. Even the Toll Brothers development, which Mayor Hayden addressed at the Feb. 4th meeting, won’t be completed for about 2 years, and, according to Mr. Hayden, the maximum number of homes will be about 200. Therefore, if LISD is preparing to rezone the schools boundaries, it would seem evident that their decision is based on current growth figures, rather than future projections.
The intent of my column was not to point an accusatory finger at the current town leaders, but to illustrate what may become a neccessary adjustment to the numbers in the future.
Quote
 
 
-5 #3 Just Damage Control 2013-02-07 09:01
I think you missed one important factor Bob. Council woman Stephenson was on this rezoning committee right up until January 2013. She quit the day the current two rezoning plans were released to the public.
If the Town Councl really wanted do something to fix this mess they would undo their changes to smart growth.
At this point their resolution is nothing more than an attempt at damage control. It is akin to those people who start fires and then try to be the hero by putting them out. In reality they cannot tell LISD what to do or how to do it. So this is all just a bunch of hot air!
Now one would hope that LISD an it's elected school board would have the good sense to make fact based decisions regarding rezoning that take into condsideration the safety and educational well being of the students under their care. Let's keep in mind the committee is only making a recommendation to the board, the board can then make any changes they see fit based on relevant data.
Quote
 
 
+5 #2 Chris 2013-02-06 19:10
I don't understand why Flower Mound is still part of LISD. Time to move on and create a new.
Quote
 
 
+1 #1 Bryan Webb 2013-02-06 17:46
A quick check of the Town's website will show you the resolution that council will consider Friday evening.
Quote
 

Add comment


Thanks for your interest in commenting on our website. We encourage you to share your thoughts and opinions. To encourage stimulating and civil discussions, we ask that you adhere to the following guidelines: You agree, through your use of this website that you will not post any material which is false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise in violation of ANY law. Legal actions can be taken against you. CrossTimbersGazette.com is not responsible for the content posted on this forum. We do not warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information presented. The messages express the views of the author, not necessarily the views of CrossTimbersGazette.com. Anyone who feels that a posted message is objectionable is encouraged to notify an administrator immediately. We have the rights to remove objectionable content, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold harmless CrossTimbersGazette.com, its owner, parent company, subsidies and any related websites to this forum. We at CrossTimbersGazette.com also reserve the right to reveal your identity (or any information we have about you) in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any information posted by you. Once your comment is published, it can be found in search results on websites like Google and Yahoo. If you feel a comment violates the above guidelines, please notify us at http://www.crosstimbersgazette.com/index.php/contact.


Security code
Refresh

Facebook Share

Share on facebook
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner