
Uther wrote:Imagine owning a vehicle with a "drop-dead" range. And no charging stations anywhere in sight. You can't charge them when you're parked at work, when you're parking for shopping, etc. Nada. So you have to be tethered to home and go home frequently enough to be able to charge your little go-around.
Uther wrote:And for that you have to pay a premium?

Uther wrote:Have you tried looking into the feasibility of owning an all-electric car?

JKTex wrote:As one that bought an even $150 in diesel to fill up my truck today, I can say, diesel is all over the place.
Uther wrote:JKTex wrote:As one that bought an even $150 in diesel to fill up my truck today, I can say, diesel is all over the place.
Seriously? Because we had a diesel vehicle in a different country and I'd like to have another. But I look at gas stations and not all (most?) don't have a diesel pump.
Help me out here. Can you name the gas stations on 407 (or 1171 - depends on where you drive) that serve diesel?
If we go on a road trip, I suppose we could fill up at truck stops.
neighbor wrote:I read something recently referring to how much technically accessible oil we have under the U.S. that isn't being tapped (technically accessible = oil that can be tapped using existing technology, processes, etc.). It stated that most attempts to drill are met with resistance from environmentalists (this we knew). But there was a hint that significantly powerful environmentalist organizations may be receiving funding from OPEC. Haven't done the research on this yet, but it's an interesting point to ponder. I'd like to learn more (validate) this info.

evblazer wrote:Wonder if opec sponsored that h2 vs prius life cycle analysis too. Not that it is 100% false but everything is worst case scenerio on top of hype sort of like politics and marketing in general.
It really would be money well spent for opec in both cases maybe the environmental groups should ask them directly I know they are hard up for $.

Al wrote:neighbor wrote:I read something recently referring to how much technically accessible oil we have under the U.S. that isn't being tapped (technically accessible = oil that can be tapped using existing technology, processes, etc.). It stated that most attempts to drill are met with resistance from environmentalists (this we knew). But there was a hint that significantly powerful environmentalist organizations may be receiving funding from OPEC. Haven't done the research on this yet, but it's an interesting point to ponder. I'd like to learn more (validate) this info.
Funding by OPEC to any significant degree? Sounds a bit far-fetched, but I guess wouldn't be too surprising considering how much special interests (the ones that have $$ anyway) control things these days. If you have any luck validating that info, please let us know.
evblazer wrote:Wonder if opec sponsored that h2 vs prius life cycle analysis too. Not that it is 100% false but everything is worst case scenerio on top of hype sort of like politics and marketing in general.
It really would be money well spent for opec in both cases maybe the environmental groups should ask them directly I know they are hard up for $.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests