CopperCanyonResident wrote:skiing1974 wrote:On the other hand, for my dear friend CCR, what would you change and put in place and take out if you were running the land to put it back to where it was and how would you address the fact that population isn't the same as it was back then, starting with us damn immigrants who came and certainly contributed in all positive and negative ways to change the land? I
I've been rather hard on you lately, Skiing Slavic Immigrant. Thanks for posting your question the way you did. I TRY SIR.
Please keep in mind that the Founding Fathers were folks who benefitted from thousands of years of history, and came to their conclusions based on that history. They were well-read in classical literature, and therefore understood the nature of man, and the limits of politics. SO THEY SOUND TO ME LIKE INTELLECTUALS YOU HAVE BEEN HARD ON LATELY.
Uther makes a good point, although he struggles to make a good, tight, concise argument. I think I get his point though - what is the ideal point in the past that we ought to go back to? How about to 1830 when Africans were enslaved? Was that an ideal era? I think that is what he had in mind, and yes, given human frailty, one would fail to find a perfect point in time save perhaps one: A. D. 33 or thereabouts. THIS TELLS ME WHAT I NEEDED TO HEAR FROM YOU. DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE THAT ANY LAND IN THE WORLD IS THE SAME AS 182 YEARS AGO?
I am very skeptical of those who push for Utopia here on Earth. Utopia means no place, and that is why those who seek heaven on Earth tend to bring only such things as the concentration camp, the gulag archipelago, and the Chinese laogai. I DON'T PUSH UTOPIA, I WAS MORE REFERRING TO YOUR VIEW OF WHERE WE SHOULD BE IN 2012 AS ONE...ESPECIALLY NOW THAT YOU COMPARE IT TO 1830.
I can offer some suggestions as to what we ought to seek as a nation. Those things are:
- A recognition of the sanctity of human life. If humans can decide what is human life, then human life will soon be degraded. I WILL NOT GO INTO ABORTION HERE AS WE HAVE OTHER PLACES FOR THAT. WERE YOU FOR THE IRAQ WAR? WERE YOU FOR AFGHANISTAN WAR? WERE YOU FOR KOSOVO WAR? IF YOU SAY NO TO ALL, I AM WITH YOU, IF YOU SAY YES, THEN PLEASE EXPLAIN BEING FOR WORTHLESS WARS AND SANCTITY OF HUMAN LIFE.
- A return to the belief that the Constitution actually means what it says. A recogntition of the Bill of Rights as being inviolate. A complete and total abandonment of the idea that the Constitution has "penumbras." AGREED, WITH SOME UPDATES TO IT TO 2.0 BEING IT IS A DIFFERENT ERA?
- An firm resolve to rid the US of Marxist ideas - a complete and total purging of Academe of Marxist professors and the ideas they are pushing that are contrary to our ideas as a people. The Marxist ideas are not consistent with our founding. They are foreign ideas that have failed whenever and whereever they have been tried. They are anti-human, and anti-Christian. They are based on the failed idea that we can achieve heaven on Earth. Marxism is the modern day equivalent of the Tower of Babel. FIRST OF ALL, DID FOUNDING FATHERS STATE THAT ONLY SOME IDEAS AND FREEDOMS ARE ALLOWED, NOT ALL OF THEM? I SAID IT BEFORE, NOT SURE WHAT COLLEGE YOU WENT TO, BUT I CERTAINLY WASN'T IN ANY SORT OF MARXIST BRAINWASHING AT 2 I WENT TO. YOU CAN CALL THOSE IDEAS ANTI-HUMAN, I WILL AGREE. CALLING THEM ANTI-CHRISTIAN SIMPLY BECAUSE COMMUNISTS AND MARXISTS DON'T BELIEVE IN GOD IS, WELL, FUNNY. WHAT PARTS OF MARXIST THEORY IS ANTI-CHRISTIAN?
- A return to self-reliance. Too many modern Americans are pathetic drones dependent on the State. That is NOT what America is about, and will end badly. AGREED.
- A return to the sanctify of the family as the building block of society - a unique and inviolate institution. Families come about through procreation. Procreation can only take place when a man and a women engage in sexual congress. Homosexual "marriage" is an infertile farce, and is not only contrary to the laws of God, but also contrary to the laws of Nature. That much is self-evident, regardless of one's religions inclinations, or lack thereof. AGREED.
- A return to true free markets - as opposed to the corporatist, rigged game here in the US, that is nothing more than the nexus of big business and big government. How can mankind remain free in such an "economy?" MF Global is a fitting example. AGREED.
- A return to freedom. We believe we live in a free country, but do we really? Those of us old enough to remember what a free American was like should be appalled by modern America. Whenever I hear the National Anthem, I want to vomit, because I know what Americe was and what America IS. It most certainly is NOT a free country anymore, and the remaining freedoms we have are slipping away at an exponential rate. AGREED, BUT IT IS A DIFFERENT WORLD TODAY. WHO ENACTED THE PATRIOT ACT THAT TO ME IS THE BIGGEST OBVIOUS ATTACK ON FREEDOMS IN THE LAST 20 YEARS? BUT AREN'T SOME FREEDOMS GOING TO GO AWAY WITH THE NEW WORLD ORDER?
- A return to the belief that the State exists to serve the people - not the other way round. AGREED. BUT TO WHAT CAPACITY?
Those are some initial ideas that spring to mind. There are likely more buried in the deep recessess of my aged mind, but the above is a start. I have a grand-daughter whining for attention, so I must say good-night for now.
If any immigrant comes to these shores, and recognizes and appreciates our ideals, he will be welcomed as one of our brethren. If, however, any immigrant comes to our shores and denigrates our ideas, and works to overthrow what is the last great hope of humanity, then he should be recognized for the threat that he is and should be attacked, ridiculed, and ridden out of the country on a rail - even if he is the current occupant of the White House, a bastard brat born to a Kenyan Communist.
Oh, and Sandy Brake - we all belong to one race and it is called mankind or man. Gender is not an issue here. Please put down your current copy of Cosmopolitan and start to read something meaningful. It is not 1978 anymore. Time has moved on and your mindless crap is just pathetic now. No one cares now about such gender oriented mind-candy. Pick up a piece of classical literature and learn something meaningful. Human beings are ALL fallen creatures, whether they have testicles or a vagina. Please spare us the 1970s "I am woman hear me roar" crap. It is even more pathetic than an episode of Oprah.