The Cross Timbers Gazette

Skeptic finds he now agrees global warming is real

Discuss and debate politics, religion, civil rights and current events.

Moderators: Al-La-Mod, admin

Re: Skeptic finds he now agrees global warming is real

Postby Uther » Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:16 am

Some more climate change news:

Methane discovery stokes new global warming fears Shock as retreat of Arctic releases greenhouse gas

Scientists estimate that there are hundreds of millions of tons of methane gas locked away beneath the Arctic permafrost, which extends from the mainland into the seabed of the relatively shallow sea of the East Siberian Arctic Shelf.

One of the greatest fears is that with the disappearance of the Arctic sea ice in summer, and rapidly rising temperatures across the entire Arctic region, which are already melting the Siberian permafrost, the trapped methane could be suddenly released into the atmosphere leading to rapid and severe climate change.
I finally found an avatar that works!
User avatar
Uther
King of the Block
 
Posts: 2228
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 7:00 pm

Re: Skeptic finds he now agrees global warming is real

Postby slider701 » Sat Dec 17, 2011 1:03 pm

All this means is that we need to start drilling/fracking up at the Arctic permafrost and pipe the natural gas south so we we can heat our homes, power the electric plants and get more cars running on CNG !
User avatar
slider701
King of the Block
 
Posts: 1123
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:46 pm

Re: Skeptic finds he now agrees global warming is real

Postby Common Sense Al » Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:59 pm

NASA: Global warming caused mostly by humans

It finds, like other major scientific research, that greenhouse gases generated by human activities -- not changes in solar activity -- are the primary cause of global warming.


I guess NASA must be full of flaky liberal scientists, because man-made global warming couldn't possibly be real, right josh? :D
Image
Now THAT'S common sense.
User avatar
Common Sense Al
King of the Block
 
Posts: 10544
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 9:02 am
Location: Larkspur, Lantana

Re: Skeptic finds he now agrees global warming is real

Postby josh » Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:22 am

Common Sense Al wrote:NASA: Global warming caused mostly by humans

It finds, like other major scientific research, that greenhouse gases generated by human activities -- not changes in solar activity -- are the primary cause of global warming.


I guess NASA must be full of flaky liberal scientists, because man-made global warming couldn't possibly be real, right josh? :D


I'm glad you resurrected this post - good timing since it seems that more and more scientists are coming out against the MMGW hysteria.

Some clarity first: nobody denies that humans generate gases. I believe it is somewhere around 1st grade that we learn that humans generate gas that fuels plants and plants release oxygen. So if you are setting up a strawman to paint GOPers as people who deny that humans release gas then you can stop right now. Nobody is falling for that. If your claim is that humans are responsible for the micro heating of the earth coming out of the ice age then that evidence is under massive attack. I posted a link to a reference to thousands of scientists who refute that notion. You turned around and said that that wasnt enough scientists - proving once again you are not looking for an even debate - only for a forum by which you can dish out your propoganda. When you give one shred of evidence that are you open to fact based evidence supporting an opposite view I will engage you again. Until then, feel free to muck up this forum with your close minded hysteria.

The sky is falling...the sky is falling...

Here is something to chew on. Recent WSJ letter from 16 scientists. Knowing you, 16 is not nearly enough and you will dismiss their claims out of hand.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... 21366.html

In case you cannot access, here are a few paragraphs:

In September, Nobel Prize-winning physicist Ivar Giaever, a supporter of President Obama in the last election, publicly resigned from the American Physical Society (APS) with a letter that begins: "I did not renew [my membership] because I cannot live with the [APS policy] statement: 'The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth's physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now.' In the APS it is OK to discuss whether the mass of the proton changes over time and how a multi-universe behaves, but the evidence of global warming is incontrovertible?"

In spite of a multidecade international campaign to enforce the message that increasing amounts of the "pollutant" carbon dioxide will destroy civilization, large numbers of scientists, many very prominent, share the opinions of Dr. Giaever. And the number of scientific "heretics" is growing with each passing year. The reason is a collection of stubborn scientific facts.

Perhaps the most inconvenient fact is the lack of global warming for well over 10 years now. This is known to the warming establishment, as one can see from the 2009 "Climategate" email of climate scientist Kevin Trenberth: "The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't." But the warming is only missing if one believes computer models where so-called feedbacks involving water vapor and clouds greatly amplify the small effect of CO2.

Although the number of publicly dissenting scientists is growing, many young scientists furtively say that while they also have serious doubts about the global-warming message, they are afraid to speak up for fear of not being promoted—or worse. They have good reason to worry. In 2003, Dr. Chris de Freitas, the editor of the journal Climate Research, dared to publish a peer-reviewed article with the politically incorrect (but factually correct) conclusion that the recent warming is not unusual in the context of climate changes over the past thousand years. The international warming establishment quickly mounted a determined campaign to have Dr. de Freitas removed from his editorial job and fired from his university position
“"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, go from us in peace. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!" —Samuel Adams
josh
King of the Block
 
Posts: 1687
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 6:04 pm
Location: Lantana

Re: Skeptic finds he now agrees global warming is real

Postby Common Sense Al » Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:38 am

Wow josh... I just can't have a reasonable discussion with you since you keep changing stuff.

I don't even know what your point is... are you now arguing that we don't need to do anything about global warming? Does that mean that you have you finally accepted that man-made global warming is probably real?

Your latest reply is irrelevant to mine. NASA says that man-made global warming is real, as does other major scientific research. You come back with an argument focusing on what to do about it, not about whether it is real or not... not to mention your drama "the sky is falling".

Now, forgetting about what to do about it (that's another discussion), do you accept as "probably true", based on NASA research and other major scientific research, that man-made global warming is real? Or are you still in denial? What to do about it, if anything, is another discussion entirely.

Oh, and I'll believe major scientific research more than a long list of so-called "scientists" giving their opinions on the matter, who probably haven't done much actual research, if any, to form those opinions.
Image
Now THAT'S common sense.
User avatar
Common Sense Al
King of the Block
 
Posts: 10544
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 9:02 am
Location: Larkspur, Lantana

Re: Skeptic finds he now agrees global warming is real

Postby josh » Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:56 am

It is this statement below that prevents me from having any type of logical discussion with you. How do you YOU know what research they have done? What gives YOU the right to call them "so-called scientists". Step forward with some evidence for the reason why you discredit them or quit using this line of attack. You cant have it both ways. I can play that silly game as well Al. It takes no skill or effort to attack and dismiss out of hand simply because I do not like what someone is saying.

"Oh, and I'll believe major scientific research more than a long list of so-called "scientists" giving their options on the matter, who probably haven't done much actual research, if any, to form those opinions."

Here is my attack on your so-called scientists at NASA using your line of reasoning:

"These so-called scientists at NASA are completely funded by the govt who has a clear motive on why they need MMGW to be true. They cannot be impartial because of this and should not be trusted." Dont ask me to back up this notion...but because it helps bolster my case...it must be true.
“"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, go from us in peace. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!" —Samuel Adams
josh
King of the Block
 
Posts: 1687
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 6:04 pm
Location: Lantana

Re: Skeptic finds he now agrees global warming is real

Postby Common Sense Al » Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:03 am

Josh, if you think the scientists at NASA, who have many millions of dollars worth of "research equipment" at their disposal, are just "so-called" scientists, then there is no point continuing this discussion with you. I have better things to waste my time on. :D

You can choose to believe your list of thousands of "scientists" giving their opinions (I wonder how many are elementary or high school science teachers?), and I'll choose to believe NASA and other scientists who have actually done major research on the topic.

As for what to do about it, that is a whole other can of worms.
Image
Now THAT'S common sense.
User avatar
Common Sense Al
King of the Block
 
Posts: 10544
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 9:02 am
Location: Larkspur, Lantana

Re: Skeptic finds he now agrees global warming is real

Postby josh » Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:20 am

Common Sense Al wrote:Josh, if you think the scientists at NASA, who have many millions of dollars worth of "research equipment" at their disposal, are just "so-called" scientists, then there is no point continuing this discussion with you. I have better things to waste my time on. :D

You can choose to believe your list of thousands of "scientists" giving their opinions (I wonder how many are elementary or high school science teachers?), and I'll choose to believe NASA and other scientists who have actually done major research on the topic.

As for what to do about it, that is a whole other can of worms.


LOL!

That line I wrote about NASA was completely lost on you, wasnt it. Did you not read my preamble on why I was writing it??!
Here it is again and I will bold the part you missed:

Here is my attack on your so-called scientists at NASA using your line of reasoning

You cannot get on to me for using a line of reasoning against YOUR NASA scientists when I am relying on YOUR same line of reasoning against the scientists I put forth.

Here is YOUR reasoning in simple form:

Expert X said something I do not like
Having no basis with which to question Expert X credentials, I will question them anyways
Expert X is no expert because I dont like what they said
Therefore, Expert X statement is not true.

I simply turned the tables on you and used that reasoning against NASA. I have REAL views about NASA but that is not what you are interested in. YOu are interested in only those views that support your opinion. Sound reasoning need not apply here - right Al?
“"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, go from us in peace. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!" —Samuel Adams
josh
King of the Block
 
Posts: 1687
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 6:04 pm
Location: Lantana

Re: Skeptic finds he now agrees global warming is real

Postby Common Sense Al » Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:37 am

josh wrote:I simply turned the tables on you and used that reasoning against NASA. I have REAL views about NASA but that is not what you are interested in. YOu are interested in only those views that support your opinion. Sound reasoning need not apply here - right Al?


Josh, you brought up your list of scientists, so you prove that they are credible... I don't think I need to prove that NASA scientists are credible.

Also, I'm not going to spend time "proving" everything I say. If I was a paid scientist doing research, then it would make sense... besides, a lot of it can't really be proven... we'd just debate for all eternity.

But, again, I'll stick with NASA and the general consensus of scientists who have done major research on the topic... you can stick with scientists who fit your and the GOP's agenda. :D

But the above brings up another question I asked awhile back and I don't think I got an answer for... and that is: is there anything that the GOP platform says that you think is wrong? The reason I ask is that it goes toward your credibility. I'm guessing you think that the GOP platform/stance is right on everything.
Image
Now THAT'S common sense.
User avatar
Common Sense Al
King of the Block
 
Posts: 10544
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 9:02 am
Location: Larkspur, Lantana

Re: Skeptic finds he now agrees global warming is real

Postby josh » Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:57 am

Common Sense Al wrote:
josh wrote:I simply turned the tables on you and used that reasoning against NASA. I have REAL views about NASA but that is not what you are interested in. YOu are interested in only those views that support your opinion. Sound reasoning need not apply here - right Al?


Josh, you brought up your list of scientists, so you prove that they are credible... I don't think I need to prove that NASA scientists are credible.

Also, I'm not going to spend time "proving" everything I say. If I was a paid scientist doing research, then it would make sense... besides, a lot of it can't really be proven... we'd just debate for all eternity.

But, again, I'll stick with NASA and the general consensus of scientists who have done major research on the topic... you can stick with scientists who fit your and the GOP's agenda. :D

But the above brings up another question I asked awhile back and I don't think I got an answer for... and that is: is there anything that the GOP platform says that you think is wrong? The reason I ask is that it goes toward your credibility. I'm guessing you think that the GOP platform/stance is right on everything.


I dont speak for the GOP. I speak for myself and I generally provide good evidence for my conclusions. If you want the GOP view then you can go to their website. It would be easier for you to paint me as a 100% backer of the GOP -that way you can point to some minor GOP talking point to discredit some other current argument we are having. But unfortunately that option is not available to you. If you want my opinion on each GOP view then list them and I will provide. Should I pull the DNC talking points and run them by you as well? I'm guessing you think the DNC platform is right on everything (except abortion of course. I guess you are batting 99.9%).
“"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, go from us in peace. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!" —Samuel Adams
josh
King of the Block
 
Posts: 1687
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 6:04 pm
Location: Lantana

Re: Skeptic finds he now agrees global warming is real

Postby Common Sense Al » Wed Feb 01, 2012 12:12 pm

josh wrote:I dont speak for the GOP. I speak for myself and I generally provide good evidence for my conclusions. If you want the GOP view then you can go to their website. It would be easier for you to paint me as a 100% backer of the GOP -that way you can point to some minor GOP talking point to discredit some other current argument we are having. But unfortunately that option is not available to you. If you want my opinion on each GOP view then list them and I will provide. Should I pull the DNC talking points and run them by you as well? I'm guessing you think the DNC platform is right on everything (except abortion of course. I guess you are batting 99.9%).


Well, I'd just like to know if there is any major policy stance that the GOP takes that you disagree with... because you are very predictable when it comes to figuring out where you stand. If the GOP is for it, then you are for it, if they're against it, then you're against it... and you use the GOP talking points to defend your positions. I really think you should see if you can get a job with the GOP. :D

As for me, I'm an independent. Use to be mostly Republican, though I do think I voted for Ross Perot back in the day. Anyway, right now I'd say the DNC gets it right more of the time... of course the major exception is abortion & morality issues. A way you can tell I'm independent is that there is no way the GOP would hire me with my views on healthcare & taxes, and there is no way the DNC would hire me with my views on abortion & morality. :D

Anyway, surely you can at least answer the question: is any major policy stance that the GOP takes that you disagree with? Major being things like taxes, healthcare, spending, environment, debt, gov't, major moral issues, major social issues, etc.
Image
Now THAT'S common sense.
User avatar
Common Sense Al
King of the Block
 
Posts: 10544
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 9:02 am
Location: Larkspur, Lantana

Re: Skeptic finds he now agrees global warming is real

Postby josh » Wed Feb 01, 2012 12:21 pm

Common Sense Al wrote:
josh wrote:I dont speak for the GOP. I speak for myself and I generally provide good evidence for my conclusions. If you want the GOP view then you can go to their website. It would be easier for you to paint me as a 100% backer of the GOP -that way you can point to some minor GOP talking point to discredit some other current argument we are having. But unfortunately that option is not available to you. If you want my opinion on each GOP view then list them and I will provide. Should I pull the DNC talking points and run them by you as well? I'm guessing you think the DNC platform is right on everything (except abortion of course. I guess you are batting 99.9%).


Well, I'd just like to know if there is any major policy stance that the GOP takes that you disagree with... because you are very predictable when it comes to figuring out where you stand. If the GOP is for it, then you are for it, if they're against it, then you're against it... and you use the GOP talking points to defend your positions. I really think you should see if you can get a job with the GOP. :D

As for me, I'm an independent. Use to be mostly Republican, though I do think I voted for Ross Perot back in the day. Anyway, right now I'd say the DNC gets it right more of the time... of course the major exception is abortion & morality issues. A way you can tell I'm independent is that there is no way the GOP would hire me with my views on healthcare & taxes, and there is no way the DNC would hire me with my views on abortion & morality. :D

Anyway, surely you can at least answer the question: is any major policy stance that the GOP takes that you disagree with? Major being things like taxes, healthcare, spending, environment, debt, gov't, major moral issues, major social issues, etc.


I repeat, once again, put forward the official GOP policy stance and I will provide an opinion. I think it is funny that you believe there is this magic GOP book of views and that anyone with a slightly different view is not a Republican. Have you not been paying attention to the GOP primary debates?! There are several solutions that Republican candidates put forward to solve a variety of issues. The clear difference in most cases between GOP and DNC is that the former mostly base their view on the idea of esential liberty, personal freedom. Whereas the DNC starts from a view of central planning.

If according you to, you are an independent simply by virtue of the fact that you disagree with ONE issue in the DNC platform, then I would guess that under that definition, just about everyone in the US is an independent since most people take issue with atleast some particular point or plan put forth by their party.

In fact, I like your reasoning here. I now claim to be an independent.
“"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, go from us in peace. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!" —Samuel Adams
josh
King of the Block
 
Posts: 1687
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 6:04 pm
Location: Lantana

Re: Skeptic finds he now agrees global warming is real

Postby Common Sense Al » Wed Feb 01, 2012 12:28 pm

josh wrote:I repeat, once again, put forward the official GOP policy stance and I will provide an opinion. I think it is funny that you believe there is this magic GOP book of views and that anyone with a slightly different view is not a Republican. Have you not been paying attention to the GOP primary debates?! There are several solutions that Republican candidates put forward to solve a variety of issues. The clear difference in most cases between GOP and DNC is that the former mostly base their view on the idea of esential liberty, personal freedom. Whereas the DNC starts from a view of central planning.


OK then. Should I get 'excessively bored' then I may list some items for you, but I don't think I will get that bored. :)

And the view that the DNC starts with "central planning" just helps to prove my theory you buy into the GOP crap. I guess you also think Obama has been running around the world apologizing for the US? And that there are actually "death panels" in the healthcare bill? :lol: Please tell me you don't believe it.

josh wrote:If according you to, you are an independent simply by virtue of the fact that you disagree with ONE issue in the DNC platform, then I would guess that under that definition, just about everyone in the US is an independent since most people take issue with atleast some particular point or plan put forth by their party.


It's not just "one issue", it's a MAJOR ISSUE. And it's not only abortion, it's gay marriage... so I guess that is TWO MAJOR ISSUES? I'm sure there is more, but you'd have to list them if you want to know my view. :)

josh wrote:In fact, I like your reasoning here. I now claim to be an independent.


Great... going from GOP to independent is definitely moving forward. :D But what is JUST ONE major GOP issue you disagree with because it's quite a mystery I'd love to have an answer to!
Image
Now THAT'S common sense.
User avatar
Common Sense Al
King of the Block
 
Posts: 10544
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 9:02 am
Location: Larkspur, Lantana

Re: Skeptic finds he now agrees global warming is real

Postby Common Sense Al » Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:34 pm

Image
Now THAT'S common sense.
User avatar
Common Sense Al
King of the Block
 
Posts: 10544
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 9:02 am
Location: Larkspur, Lantana

Re: Skeptic finds he now agrees global warming is real

Postby josh » Mon Apr 16, 2012 8:37 am




Cute little opinion piece.
Hey - I thought you were the guy that only like FACTS?!
“"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, go from us in peace. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!" —Samuel Adams
josh
King of the Block
 
Posts: 1687
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 6:04 pm
Location: Lantana

PreviousNext

Return to The Big Picture

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group