esemerson wrote:Use your imagination. What if an ER doctor refuses to treat a homo-sexual or whoever he/she might object to.
I'm sure that the chances of anything like that happening are ridiculously small.
esemerson wrote:Use your imagination. What if an ER doctor refuses to treat a homo-sexual or whoever he/she might object to.

esemerson wrote:Al wrote:I'm sure that the chances of anything like that happening are ridiculously small.
ok. then that makes it ok

Al wrote:undoing any good things Bush has done.
esemerson wrote:it's not 'ok' Al. And it wont stop abortions. But it can stop prescriptions from being written/filled and medical care and services. Abortions are one thing and no one should be forced to do it, but denying or refusing medical care for other things is not 'OK'

esemerson wrote:While current law already protects the religious beliefs of health care providers and professionals... here comes the refusal clause
Be careful who you choose as a medical service provider. Under Bush's new regulation health care providers can refuse service for just about any reason, not just abortions mind you.
The regulation is written so broadly that they can refuse for any reason, so long as they claim to have a moral objection to it.
If you are gay you had better hope you don't run into a doctor that has a moral objection to your lifestyle.
Need anti-biotics for your child? stay away from those scientologist doctors.
Getting birth control pills refilled? Make sure your pharmacists will fill the prescription first.
Need viagra? make sure your doctor does not morally object to erections first.
Fun stuff.
even Catholics are upset.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnw/20081218/p ... regulation
http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008 ... ublication
http://www.medpagetoday.com/PublicHealt ... licy/12027
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests