
neighbor wrote:Unfortunately, opening more foreign oil won't do much for gas prices. There isn't a shortage of oil, there's too much speculation.
I just read this... interesting. I hadn't looked at it from this angle.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25417337/
LONDON (Reuters) - It is easy to blame speculation for the doubling of oil prices over the past 12 months, but the real reasons are strong demand growth, coupled with shortages of supply and refining capacity, the IEA said on Tuesday.

Al wrote:neighbor wrote:Unfortunately, opening more foreign oil won't do much for gas prices. There isn't a shortage of oil, there's too much speculation.
I just read this... interesting. I hadn't looked at it from this angle.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25417337/
I read this earlier... says the opposite (I think the price is more due to "real" reasons than speculation - but speculation does make some difference)
http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/080701/iea_speculate.htmlLONDON (Reuters) - It is easy to blame speculation for the doubling of oil prices over the past 12 months, but the real reasons are strong demand growth, coupled with shortages of supply and refining capacity, the IEA said on Tuesday.
josh wrote:Its a combination of both. I like Newt Gingrich (shocking...I know) and think he has come up with a lot of good common sense ideas lately. One of those - relating to his campaign to "Drill Here, Drill Now, Pay Less" is that we should release 1/3 of the strategic petroleum reserve tomorrow and bankrupt all of the speculators. That would, in his estimate, lower oil by $30-$50 overnight and cause those speculators to go broke. That is a very short term fix...not really a fix, but a way to punish those who bid up future oil, not for supply and demand reasons, but for pure profit reasons.
The medium term fix is to drill in the US and take advantage of our vast supply of untapped oil and gas. The medium, to long term is to keep moving away from a oil driven economy and into clean emission generation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOpcPfAarjY
HEAD wrote:I watched the CEO of Chevron in an interview last week. He was asked why not drill more in the Gulf where it has been allowed for over 20 years. he said it was too expensive. So if we open up Florida/Alaska, who is to say the oil companies will drill there anyway. If they really wanted to do it, they would have been doing it.

Al wrote:HEAD wrote:I watched the CEO of Chevron in an interview last week. He was asked why not drill more in the Gulf where it has been allowed for over 20 years. he said it was too expensive. So if we open up Florida/Alaska, who is to say the oil companies will drill there anyway. If they really wanted to do it, they would have been doing it.
I bet it's cheaper to drill there. But I'm just guessing.![]()
Jsut because it is expensive in the Gulf, doesn't mean it would be expensive off the coast of another state or in Alaska.
HEAD wrote:No, but my point was if they really wanted to do something about forien oil, they could have a long time ago. Botom line is $$$$. Whatever way is cheaper for them.

skiing1974 wrote:Al, now can't regulate too much here when it is not in gov't interest and when that would be seen as socialistic way of market control

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests